These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26989765)
1. A Contribution of Beef to Human Health: A Review of the Role of the Animal Production Systems. Pighin D; Pazos A; Chamorro V; Paschetta F; Cunzolo S; Godoy F; Messina V; Pordomingo A; Grigioni G ScientificWorldJournal; 2016; 2016():8681491. PubMed ID: 26989765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meat quality and health implications of organic and conventional beef production. Kamihiro S; Stergiadis S; Leifert C; Eyre MD; Butler G Meat Sci; 2015 Feb; 100():306-18. PubMed ID: 25460141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of feeding systems on omega-3 fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid and trans fatty acids in Australian beef cuts: potential impact on human health. Ponnampalam EN; Mann NJ; Sinclair AJ Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2006; 15(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 16500874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform. Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Sanitary conditions for the production of beef cattle in Argentina]. Lasta JA; Rearte D Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):369-81. PubMed ID: 9501350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bill E. Kunkle Interdisciplinary Beef Symposium: Practical developments in managing animal welfare in beef cattle: what does the future hold? Lyles JL; Calvo-Lorenzo MS J Anim Sci; 2014 Dec; 92(12):5334-44. PubMed ID: 25253809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Production systems--an example from Brazil. Ferraz JB; Felício PE Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 20374781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental impacts of beef production: Review of challenges and perspectives for durability. Gerber PJ; Mottet A; Opio CI; Falcucci A; Teillard F Meat Sci; 2015 Nov; 109():2-12. PubMed ID: 26117397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model for 'sustainable' US beef production. Eshel G; Shepon A; Shaket T; Cotler BD; Gilutz S; Giddings D; Raymo ME; Milo R Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Jan; 2(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 29203916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impacts of reproductive technologies on beef production in the United States. Dahlen C; Larson J; Lamb GC Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 752():97-114. PubMed ID: 24170356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems. Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic and management factors affecting beef quality in grazing Hereford steers. Melucci LM; Panarace M; Feula P; Villarreal EL; Grigioni G; Carduza F; Soria LA; Mezzadra CA; Arceo ME; Papaleo Mazzucco J; Corva PM; Irurueta M; Rogberg-Muñoz A; Miquel MC Meat Sci; 2012 Dec; 92(4):768-74. PubMed ID: 22818350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensory quality of beef from different finishing diets. Resconi VC; Campo MM; Font i Furnols M; Montossi F; Sañudo C Meat Sci; 2010 Nov; 86(3):865-9. PubMed ID: 20696533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of organic, conventional and intensive beef farm systems: health, management and animal production. Blanco-Penedo I; López-Alonso M; Shore RF; Miranda M; Castillo C; Hernández J; Benedito JL Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1503-11. PubMed ID: 23031524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems. Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phase I of The National Beef Quality Audit-2011: quantifying willingness-to-pay, best-worst scaling, and current status of quality characteristics in different beef industry marketing sectors. Igo JL; VanOverbeke DL; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; Pendell DL; Vedral LL; Mafi GG; Moore MC; McKeith RO; Gray GD; Griffin DB; Hale DS; Savell JW; Belk KE J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1907-19. PubMed ID: 23408805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harnessing the value of reproductive hormones in cattle production with considerations to animal welfare and human health. Evans HC; Briggs EF; Burnett RH; Contreras-Correa ZE; Duvic MA; Dysart LM; Gilmore AA; Messman RD; Reid D; Rasit Ugur M; Kaya A; Memili E J Anim Sci; 2022 Jul; 100(7):. PubMed ID: 35772763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of social dominance on production, welfare and the quality of meat from beef bulls. Miranda-de la Lama GC; Pascual-Alonso M; Guerrero A; Alberti P; Alierta S; Sans P; Gajan JP; Villarroel M; Dalmau A; Velarde A; Campo MM; Galindo F; Santolaria MP; Sañudo C; María GA Meat Sci; 2013 Aug; 94(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 23618738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The effect of the addition of dried pig excrement to beef cattle diet on meat quality]. Gilka J; Habrda J; Krejcí P; Matyás Z Vet Med (Praha); 1980 Apr; 25(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 6773210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]