212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26989823)
1. Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry.
Billings CJ; Penman TM; Ellis EM; Baltzell LS; McMillan GP
Am J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26989823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
Wilson RH; McArdle R
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric functions for shortened administrations of a speech recognition approach using tri-word presentations and phonemic scoring.
Gelfand SA; Gelfand JT
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):879-91. PubMed ID: 22337493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech-in-Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery: Relationship to Perceived Auditory Disability.
Fitzgerald MB; Ward KM; Gianakas SP; Smith ML; Blevins NH; Swanson AP
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):816-826. PubMed ID: 38414136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The minimum speech test battery in profound unilateral hearing loss.
Sargent EW; Herrmann B; Hollenbeak CS; Bankaitis AE
Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jul; 22(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 11449104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Severe difficulties with word recognition in noise after platinum chemotherapy in childhood, and improvements with open-fitting hearing-aids.
Einarsson EJ; Petersen H; Wiebe T; Fransson PA; Magnusson M; Moëll C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):642-51. PubMed ID: 21812630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A demonstration of improved precision of word recognition scores.
Schlauch RS; Anderson ES; Micheyl C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):543-55. PubMed ID: 24686502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying Subclinical Hearing Loss: Extended Audiometry and Word Recognition in Noise.
Drennan WR
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 34727540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large-corpus phoneme and word recognition and the generality of lexical context in CVC word perception.
Gelfand JT; Christie RE; Gelfand SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):297-307. PubMed ID: 24687475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: A clinic protocol.
Wilson RH; Burks CA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(6):839-52. PubMed ID: 16680621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Precision of Open-Set Versus Closed-Set Word Recognition Testing.
Yu TJ; Schlauch RS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):2035-2047. PubMed ID: 31194914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
