These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26989823)

  • 21. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
    McAuliffe MJ; Wilding PJ; Rickard NA; O'Beirne GA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing auditory capabilities in young children.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Boothroyd A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1339-50. PubMed ID: 17604127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A study of recorded versus live voice word recognition.
    Mendel LL; Owen SR
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):688-93. PubMed ID: 21812631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using the speech understanding in noise (SUN) test for adult hearing screening1.
    Paglialonga A; Grandori F; Tognola G
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 23800813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech audiometry in noise-exposed workers: the SRT-PTA relationship revisited.
    Picard M; Banville R; Barbarosie T; Manolache M
    Audiology; 1999; 38(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 10052834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of visual cues on scoring of clinical word-recognition tests.
    Han HJ; Schlauch RS; Rao A
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 23(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 25166267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Vaden KI; Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Teubner-Rhodes SE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 26683042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tri-word presentations with phonemic scoring for practical high-reliability speech recognition assessment.
    Gelfand SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 46(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 14700381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated smartphone audiometry: Validation of a word recognition test app.
    Dewyer NA; Jiradejvong P; Henderson Sabes J; Limb CJ
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Mar; 128(3):707-712. PubMed ID: 28543040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test.
    Summerfield Q; Palmer AR; Foster JR; Marshall DH; Twomey T
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 7841901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the peripheral hearing system of sport divers.
    Hausmann D; Laabling S; Hoth S; Plinkert PK; Klingmann C
    Undersea Hyperb Med; 2011; 38(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 22292257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The performance/intensity function: an underused resource.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):479-91. PubMed ID: 18469711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Lyregaard PE
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.