These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26990008)

  • 1. Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Schönhammer JG; Grubert A; Kerzel D; Becker SI
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1074-83. PubMed ID: 26990008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The attentional blink: A relational accountof attentional engagement.
    Becker SI; Manoharan RT; Folk CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 32989720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How feature relationships influence attention and awareness: Evidence from eye movements and EEG.
    Martin A; Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1865-1883. PubMed ID: 30211593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
    Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conjunction search: Can we simultaneously bias attention to features and relations?
    Becker SI; Atalla M; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):246-268. PubMed ID: 31317396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down task sets for combined features: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 23143916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conjunction search is relational: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Becker SI; Harris AM; York A; Choi J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1828-1842. PubMed ID: 28967786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tuning to non-veridical features in attention and perceptual decision-making: An EEG study.
    Becker SI; Hamblin-Frohman Z; Xia H; Qiu Z
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Sep; 188():108634. PubMed ID: 37391127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):902-12. PubMed ID: 25321485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across feature dimensions.
    York AA; Sewell DK; Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1368-1386. PubMed ID: 32881554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1433-42. PubMed ID: 23244044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time matters: Feature-specific prioritization follows feature integration in visual object processing.
    Brummerloh B; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():81-93. PubMed ID: 30981854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.