These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26990606)

  • 21. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
    Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tensile strength of cementing agents on the CeraOne system of dental prosthesis on implants.
    Montenegro AC; Machado AN; Depes Gouvêa CV
    Implant Dent; 2008 Dec; 17(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 19077583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retention, marginal leakage, and cement solubility of provisional crowns cemented with temporary cement containing stannous fluoride.
    Lewinstein I; Fuhrer N; Gelfand K; Cardash H; Pilo R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 12737253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of using nano and micro airborne abrasive particles on bond strength of implant abutment to prosthesis.
    Rismanchian M; Davoudi A; Shadmehr E
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 25672384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Misfit and microleakage of implant-supported crown copings obtained by laser sintering and casting techniques, luted with glass-ionomer, resin cements and acrylic/urethane-based agents.
    Castillo-Oyagüe R; Lynch CD; Turrión AS; López-Lozano JF; Torres-Lagares D; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 23022105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin.
    Abo-Hamar SE; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Friedl KH; Schmalz G
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):794-803. PubMed ID: 16005507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of Temporary Cements on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Cement to the Metal Coronal Substrate.
    Peixoto RF; De Aguiar CR; Jacob ES; Macedo AP; De Mattos Mda G; Antunes RP
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(6):637-41. PubMed ID: 26963209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retention and marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with provisional cements enriched with chlorhexidine diacetate.
    Lewinstein I; Chweidan H; Matalon S; Pilo R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 18021826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An
    Sarfaraz H; Hassan A; Shenoy KK; Shetty M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 31040551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cross-pin retained implant supported restoration: a study of gasket placement and leakage.
    Sambrook RJ; Judge RB
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Dec; 57(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 23186564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of abutment and screw access channel modification on dislodgement of cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Hess T; Pineyro A; Chung KH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 23342335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
    Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An
    Bajoghli F; Fathi A; Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Sabouhi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():22. PubMed ID: 36960017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.