424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26990962)
1. An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Berg WK; Wacker DP; Ringdahl JE; Stricker J; Vinquist K; Salil Kumar Dutt A; Dolezal D; Luke J; Kemmerer L; Mews J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):617-38. PubMed ID: 26990962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
Lalli JS; Casey SD; Kates K
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PubMed ID: 9103988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior.
Fritz JN; Jackson LM; Stiefler NA; Wimberly BS; Richardson AR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jul; 50(3):590-599. PubMed ID: 28513826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
Newman ZA; Roscoe EM; Errera NP; Davis CR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):984-1000. PubMed ID: 33667327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
Slocum SK; Grauerholz-Fisher E; Peters KP; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 29226346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does supplementary reinforcement of stereotypy facilitate extinction?
Dozier CL; Iwata BA; Wilson DM; Thomason-Sassi JL; Roscoe EM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):242-55. PubMed ID: 24114097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.
Leon Y; Borrero JC; DeLeon IG
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):639-55. PubMed ID: 27174440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional analysis screening for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Querim AC; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Schlichenmeyer KJ; Ortega JV; Hurl KE
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 24114084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Providing alternative reinforcers to facilitate tolerance to delayed reinforcement following functional communication training.
Austin JE; Tiger JH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 25958828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Piazza CC; Adelinis JD; Hanley GP; Goh HL; Delia MD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 10738949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects and side effects of DRO as treatment for self-injurious behavior.
Cowdery GE; Iwata BA; Pace GM
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 2074238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products.
Grace NC; Thompson R; Fisher WW
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 8682739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of extinction, noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior as control procedures.
Thompson RH; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Dozier CL; Samaha AL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):221-38. PubMed ID: 12858986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caregiver preference for reinforcement-based interventions for problem behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.
Gabor AM; Fritz JN; Roath CT; Rothe BR; Gourley DA
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 26792408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Test-specific control conditions for functional analyses.
Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Querim AC; Harper JM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24114085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
