515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2699161)
1. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health.
Steinberg TN
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed amendments to the Georgia abortion statute.
Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Feb; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7077199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion counselling--a new component of medical care.
Landy U
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 3709012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current legal trends regarding abortions for minors: a dilemma for counselors.
Talbutt LC
Sch Couns; 1983 Nov; 31(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 12313169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
Grant ER
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
Glendon MA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
Mangel CP
Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions.
Orentlicher D
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Abortion in the United States. Decisions of the Supreme Court].
Veylon R
Nouv Presse Med; 1973 Jul; 2(29):1952-4. PubMed ID: 4724400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The concept of wrongful life in the law.
Kasper AS
Women Health; 1983; 8(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 6868627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.
Marsh FH
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
Bloche MG
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
