328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26992068)
1. Using Supervised Machine Learning to Classify Real Alerts and Artifact in Online Multisignal Vital Sign Monitoring Data.
Chen L; Dubrawski A; Wang D; Fiterau M; Guillame-Bert M; Bose E; Kaynar AM; Wallace DJ; Guttendorf J; Clermont G; Pinsky MR; Hravnak M
Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):e456-63. PubMed ID: 26992068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real alerts and artifact classification in archived multi-signal vital sign monitoring data: implications for mining big data.
Hravnak M; Chen L; Dubrawski A; Bose E; Clermont G; Pinsky MR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):875-888. PubMed ID: 26438655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Weakly Supervised Classification of Vital Sign Alerts as Real or Artifact.
Dey A; Goswami M; Yoon JH; Clermont G; Pinsky M; Hravnak M; Dubrawski A
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2022; 2022():405-414. PubMed ID: 37128388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of technical filtering and clinical criteria on alert rates from continuous vital sign monitoring in the general ward.
Kjærgaard K; Mølgaard J; Rasmussen SM; Meyhoff CS; Aasvang EK
Hosp Pract (1995); 2023 Dec; 51(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 38126772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-parameter vital sign database to assist in alarm optimization for general care units.
Welch J; Kanter B; Skora B; McCombie S; Henry I; McCombie D; Kennedy R; Soller B
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):895-900. PubMed ID: 26439830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards development of alert thresholds for clinical deterioration using continuous predictive analytics monitoring.
Keim-Malpass J; Clark MT; Lake DE; Moorman JR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 31327101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Five Algorithmic Methods and Machine Learning Pattern Recognition for Artifact Detection in Electronic Records of Five Different Vital Signs: A Retrospective Analysis.
Maleczek M; Laxar D; Kapral L; Kuhrn M; Abulesz YT; Dibiasi C; Kimberger O
Anesthesiology; 2024 Jul; 141(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 38466210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early recognition of acutely deteriorating patients in non-intensive care units: assessment of an innovative monitoring technology.
Zimlichman E; Szyper-Kravitz M; Shinar Z; Klap T; Levkovich S; Unterman A; Rozenblum R; Rothschild JM; Amital H; Shoenfeld Y
J Hosp Med; 2012 Oct; 7(8):628-33. PubMed ID: 22865462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nursing assessment of continuous vital sign surveillance to improve patient safety on the medical/surgical unit.
Watkins T; Whisman L; Booker P
J Clin Nurs; 2016 Jan; 25(1-2):278-81. PubMed ID: 26531215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic and Personalized Risk Forecast in Step-Down Units. Implications for Monitoring Paradigms.
Chen L; Ogundele O; Clermont G; Hravnak M; Pinsky MR; Dubrawski AW
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Mar; 14(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 28033032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated False Alarm Reduction in a Real-Life Intensive Care Setting Using Motion Detection.
Muroi C; Meier S; De Luca V; Mack DJ; Strässle C; Schwab P; Karlen W; Keller E
Neurocrit Care; 2020 Apr; 32(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 31290067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal distribution of instability events in continuously monitored step-down unit patients: implications for Rapid Response Systems.
Hravnak M; Chen L; Dubrawski A; Bose E; Pinsky MR
Resuscitation; 2015 Apr; 89():99-105. PubMed ID: 25637693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards an automated multimodal clinical decision support system at the post anesthesia care unit.
Olsen RM; Aasvang EK; Meyhoff CS; Dissing Sorensen HB
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Oct; 101():15-21. PubMed ID: 30092398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiorespiratory instability before and after implementing an integrated monitoring system.
Hravnak M; Devita MA; Clontz A; Edwards L; Valenta C; Pinsky MR
Crit Care Med; 2011 Jan; 39(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20935559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of continuous monitoring of vital signs in surgical patients on a general ward: an observational cohort study.
Leenen JPL; Dijkman EM; van Dijk JD; van Westreenen HL; Kalkman C; Schoonhoven L; Patijn GA
BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042735. PubMed ID: 33597138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends of Hemoglobin Oximetry: Do They Help Predict Blood Transfusion During Trauma Patient Resuscitation?
Yang S; Hu PF; Anazodo A; Gao C; Chen H; Wade C; Hartsky L; Miller C; Imle C; Fang R; Mackenzie CF
Anesth Analg; 2016 Jan; 122(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26683104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smoothing Effect in Vital Sign Recordings: Fact or Fiction? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Manual and Continuous Vital Sign Measurements to Assess Data Smoothing in Postoperative Care.
Tomlinson HR; Pimentel MAF; Gerry S; Clifton DA; Tarassenko L; Watkinson PJ
Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):960-966. PubMed ID: 30096079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit.
Yoon JH; Jeanselme V; Dubrawski A; Hravnak M; Pinsky MR; Clermont G
Crit Care; 2020 Nov; 24(1):661. PubMed ID: 33234161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Remote Surveillance Platform to Monitor General Care Ward Surgical Patients for Acute Physiologic Deterioration.
Safavi KC; Deng H; Driscoll W; Nikolov M; Tolia K; Wiener-Kronish JP
Anesth Analg; 2021 Oct; 133(4):933-939. PubMed ID: 33830955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of serious outcomes based on continuous vital sign monitoring of high-risk patients.
Kristinsson ÆÖ; Gu Y; Rasmussen SM; Mølgaard J; Haahr-Raunkjær C; Meyhoff CS; Aasvang EK; Sørensen HBD
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Aug; 147():105559. PubMed ID: 35635901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
