These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

893 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26992935)

  • 1. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
    Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical experience of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancer.
    Li XL; Du DF; Jiang H
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Apr; 26(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 27667447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
    Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
    Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.
    Paek J; Lee JD; Kong TW; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1043-50. PubMed ID: 26092018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
    Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
    Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology.
    El Hachem L; Momeni M; Friedman K; Moshier EL; Chuang LT; Gretz HF
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 26096813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.