155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26993819)
1. Fully automated quality assurance and localization of volumetric MEG for single-subject mapping.
Stevens T; Bardouille T; Stroink G; Boe S; Patterson S; Beyea S
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():21-31. PubMed ID: 26993819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Somatotopic finger mapping using MEG: toward an optimal stimulation paradigm.
Jamali S; Ross B
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Aug; 124(8):1659-70. PubMed ID: 23518470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activity in posterior parietal cortex following somatosensory stimulation in man: magnetoencephalographic study using spatio-temporal source analysis.
Hoshiyama M; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Watanabe S; Shimojo M
Brain Topogr; 1997; 10(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9358951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical characterization and inter-dipole distance between unilateral median versus ulnar nerve stimulation of both hands in MEG.
Theuvenet PJ; van Dijk BW; Peters MJ; van Ree JM; Lopes da Silva FL; Chen AC
Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 16977490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. BA3b and BA1 activate in a serial fashion after median nerve stimulation: direct evidence from combining source analysis of evoked fields and cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps.
Papadelis C; Eickhoff SB; Zilles K; Ioannides AA
Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 20691793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Validation of the Champagne Algorithm for Evoked Response Source Localization in Magnetoencephalography.
Bhutada AS; Cai C; Mizuiri D; Findlay A; Chen J; Tay A; Kirsch HE; Nagarajan SS
Brain Topogr; 2022 Jan; 35(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 34114168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative analysis of MEG using modified sLORETA for clinical application.
Terakawa Y; Tsuyuguchi N; Tanaka H; Shigihara Y; Sakamoto S; Takami T; Ohata K
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 119(8):1917-1922. PubMed ID: 18571466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability and bias between magnetoencephalography systems in non-invasive localization of the primary somatosensory cortex.
Bardouille T; Power L; Lalancette M; Bishop R; Beyea S; Taylor MJ; Dunkley BT
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 171():63-69. PubMed ID: 29843072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetoencephalography for clinical pediatrics: the effect of head positioning on measurement of somatosensory-evoked fields.
Gaetz W; Otsubo H; Pang EW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 119(8):1923-1933. PubMed ID: 18579439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability for non-invasive somatosensory cortex localization: Implications for pre-surgical mapping.
Solomon J; Boe S; Bardouille T
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Dec; 139():224-9. PubMed ID: 26519893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortex mapping of ipsilateral somatosensory area following anatomical hemispherectomy: a MEG study.
Yao N; Qiao H; Shu N; Wang Z; Chen D; Wu L; Deng X; Xu Y
Brain Dev; 2013 Apr; 35(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 22770545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to median nerve stimulation: interhemispheric differences in a normal population.
Wikström H; Roine RO; Salonen O; Aronen HJ; Virtanen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Huttunen J
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 104(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 9402890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Source analysis of median nerve stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials and fields using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4903-6. PubMed ID: 23367027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG) functional mapping in the presence of dental artefacts.
Hillebrand A; Fazio P; de Munck JC; van Dijk BW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 22832101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation.
Onishi H; Sugawara K; Yamashiro K; Sato D; Suzuki M; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Murakami H; Kameyama S
Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 1535():78-88. PubMed ID: 24001589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Somatosensory-evoked fields on magnetoencephalography for epilepsy infants younger than 4 years with total intravenous anesthesia.
Bercovici E; Pang EW; Sharma R; Mohamed IS; Imai K; Fujimoto A; Ochi A; Viljoen A; Chu B; Holowka S; Chuang SH; Kemp SM; Rutka JT; Carter Snead O; Otsubo H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1328-34. PubMed ID: 18406202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative magnetoencephalographic sensory cortex mapping.
Niranjan A; Laing EJ; Laghari FJ; Richardson RM; Lunsford LD
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2013; 91(5):314-22. PubMed ID: 23797479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole-head MEG analysis of cortical spatial organization from unilateral stimulation of median nerve in both hands: no complete hemispheric homology.
Theuvenet PJ; van Dijk BW; Peters MJ; van Ree JM; Lopes da Silva FL; Chen AC
Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 16040256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
