BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

834 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26995273)

  • 1. The effect of the angle of acuteness of additive manufactured models and the direction of printing on the dimensional fidelity: clinical implications.
    Ide Y; Nayar S; Logan H; Gallagher B; Wolfaardt J
    Odontology; 2017 Jan; 105(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 26995273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trueness of cone-beam computed tomography-derived skull models fabricated by different technology-based three-dimensional printers.
    Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Ferraris E; Jacobs R
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):397. PubMed ID: 37328901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional printing: technologies, applications, and limitations in neurosurgery.
    Pucci JU; Christophe BR; Sisti JA; Connolly ES
    Biotechnol Adv; 2017 Sep; 35(5):521-529. PubMed ID: 28552791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additive Manufacturing of Anatomical Models from Computed Tomography Scan Data.
    Gür Y
    Mol Cell Biomech; 2014 Dec; 11(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 26336695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer.
    Olszewski R; Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1847-52. PubMed ID: 25176496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing).
    Salmi M; Paloheimo KS; Tuomi J; Wolff J; Mäkitie A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 23333490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
    Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional printing of X-ray computed tomography datasets with multiple materials using open-source data processing.
    Sander IM; McGoldrick MT; Helms MN; Betts A; van Avermaete A; Owers E; Doney E; Liepert T; Niebur G; Liepert D; Leevy WM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):383-391. PubMed ID: 28231405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
    Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray computed tomography evaluations of additive manufactured multimaterial composites.
    Curto M; Kao AP; Keeble W; Tozzi G; Barber AH
    J Microsc; 2022 Mar; 285(3):131-143. PubMed ID: 34057229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models.
    Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology.
    Alharbi N; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 27611757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery?
    Louvrier A; Marty P; Barrabé A; Euvrard E; Chatelain B; Weber E; Meyer C
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 118(4):206-212. PubMed ID: 28732777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.
    Anadioti E; Kane B; Zhang Y; Bergler M; Mante F; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):30-37. PubMed ID: 35313026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [COMPUTER ASSISTED DESIGN AND ELECTRON BEAMMELTING RAPID PROTOTYPING METAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING TECHNOLOGY FOR PREPARATION OF INDIVIDUALIZED FEMORAL PROSTHESIS].
    Liu H; Weng Y; Zhang Y; Xu N; Tong J; Wang C
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 29(9):1088-91. PubMed ID: 26750005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D Printing of Preoperative Simulation Models of a Splenic Artery Aneurysm: Precision and Accuracy.
    Takao H; Amemiya S; Shibata E; Ohtomo K
    Acad Radiol; 2017 May; 24(5):650-653. PubMed ID: 28130050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology.
    Tran-Gia J; Schlögl S; Lassmann M
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 27445291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgery of complex craniofacial defects: A single-step AM-based methodology.
    Volpe Y; Furferi R; Governi L; Uccheddu F; Carfagni M; Mussa F; Scagnet M; Genitori L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 165():225-233. PubMed ID: 30337077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.