198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26995688)
21. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy with 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles for the "precision medicine" of pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study.
Yoshizawa N; Yamada R; Sakuno T; Inoue H; Miura H; Takeuchi T; Nakamura M; Hamada Y; Katsurahara M; Tanaka K; Horiki N; Takei Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(24):e11096. PubMed ID: 29901627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses.
Lee JK; Lee KT; Choi ER; Jang TH; Jang KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 48(6):752-7. PubMed ID: 23600919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of the Standard 22G Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Tissue Core Biopsy in Pancreatic Cancer.
Seicean A; Gheorghiu M; Zaharia T; Calinici T; Samarghitan A; Marcus B; Cainap S; Seicean R
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2016 Jun; 25(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 27308653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A 19-Gauge Histology Needle Versus a 19-Gauge Standard Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Study (GREATER Study).
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Mukai T; Togawa O; Matsubara S; Hatano Y; Hara A; Tanaka M; Shibahara J; Fukayama M; Isayama H; Yasuda I
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Apr; 63(4):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29464585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses (with videos).
Mukai S; Itoi T; Ashida R; Tsuchiya T; Ikeuchi N; Kamada K; Tanaka R; Umeda J; Tonozuka R; Fukutake N; Hoshi K; Moriyasu F; Gotoda T; Irisawa A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1210-7. PubMed ID: 26522372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 22-gauge core
Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
Vanbiervliet G; Napoléon B; Saint Paul MC; Sakarovitch C; Wangermez M; Bichard P; Subtil C; Koch S; Grandval P; Gincul R; Karsenti D; Heyries L; Duchmann JC; Bourgaux JF; Levy M; Calament G; Fumex F; Pujol B; Lefort C; Poincloux L; Pagenault M; Bonin EA; Fabre M; Barthet M
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25098612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
Iwashita T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Uemura S; Mabuchi M; Shimizu M; Hatano Y; Hara A; Moriwaki H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25440688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study.
Sato J; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Fujie S; Kaneko J; Satoh T; Matsubayashi H; Kishida Y; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30676114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.
Gimeno-García AZ; Elwassief A; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sahai AV
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 24877242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):336-43. PubMed ID: 22817786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis.
Madhoun MF; Wani SB; Rastogi A; Early D; Gaddam S; Tierney WM; Maple JT
Endoscopy; 2013; 45(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 23307148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
