These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26995843)

  • 1. A New Restorative Material for Pediatric Dentistry.
    Kisby L
    Dent Today; 2016 Feb; 35(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 26995843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creating the "Perfect" Class V Composite: The Matrix Is Key.
    Belvedere PC; Lambert DL
    Dent Today; 2016 Feb; 35(2):104, 106-7. PubMed ID: 26995844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of prepolymerized composite megafiller on the marginal adaptation of composite restorations in cavities with different C-factors: an SEM study.
    Bhushan S; Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 21187613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restoring class II cavities with composite resin, utilising the bulk filling technique.
    Lally U
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 24812757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Class II composite placement is difficult! Solutions to help overcome the clinical challenges.
    Goodchild JH
    Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):110, 112, 114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 24358548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Smart" Class V Preparation Design for Direct Composites.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2015 Feb; 34(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 26349261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cuspal movement related to different polymerization protocols.
    Piccioni MA; Baratto-Filho F; Kuga MC; Morais EC; Campos EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 24939260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental and FE displacement and polymerization stress of bonded restorations as a function of the C-Factor, volume and substrate stiffness.
    Boaro LC; Brandt WC; Meira JB; Rodrigues FP; Palin WM; Braga RR
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 24296164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding light curing, Part I. Delivering predictable and successful restorations.
    Strassler HE; Price RB
    Dent Today; 2014 May; 33(5):114, 116, 118 passim; quiz 121. PubMed ID: 25283042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-lasting multishade composite restorations.
    Margeas R
    Dent Today; 2013 Feb; 32(2):114, 116. PubMed ID: 23431875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of one-step incomplete and complete excavation in primary teeth: a 24-month randomized controlled trial.
    Franzon R; Guimarães LF; Magalhães CE; Haas AN; Araujo FB
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 24732081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of polymerization mode and time of adhesive system on microleakage in composite resin restorations.
    Soares GP; Silva GG; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Lovadino JR; Aguiar FH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 23946239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A conservative treatment approach using direct composite resins for anterior teeth eroded by lemon sucking.
    Passos VF; de Souza AM; Rodrigues LK; Bombonatti JC; Santiago SL
    Gen Dent; 2013 Aug; 61(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23928446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of partial caries removal restorations performed in primary teeth.
    Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Demarco FF; Garcia-Godoy F; De Araujo FB; Casagrande L
    Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 25000663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.