These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26996262)

  • 21. An integrated approach to energy recovery from biomass and waste: Anaerobic digestion-gasification-water treatment.
    Milani M; Montorsi L; Stefani M
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jul; 32(7):614-25. PubMed ID: 24946772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Method development and evaluation of pyrolysis oils from mixed waste plastic by GC-VUV.
    Dunkle MN; Pijcke P; Winniford WL; Ruitenbeek M; Bellos G
    J Chromatogr A; 2021 Jan; 1637():461837. PubMed ID: 33383237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A batch assay to measure microbial hydrogen sulfide production from sulfur-containing solid wastes.
    Sun M; Sun W; Barlaz MA
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 May; 551-552():23-31. PubMed ID: 26874757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Economic screening of renewable energy technologies: Incineration, anaerobic digestion, and biodiesel as applied to waste water scum.
    Anderson E; Addy M; Ma H; Chen P; Ruan R
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Dec; 222():202-209. PubMed ID: 27721096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A review of technologies and performances of thermal treatment systems for energy recovery from waste.
    Lombardi L; Carnevale E; Corti A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():26-44. PubMed ID: 25535103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Future of Flash Graphene for the Sustainable Management of Solid Waste.
    Barbhuiya NH; Kumar A; Singh A; Chandel MK; Arnusch CJ; Tour JM; Singh SP
    ACS Nano; 2021 Oct; 15(10):15461-15470. PubMed ID: 34633174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bioenergy Potential from Food Waste in California.
    Breunig HM; Jin L; Robinson A; Scown CD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 28072520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of microwave pre-treatment of thickened waste activated sludge on biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, thickened waste activated sludge and municipal sludge.
    Ara E; Sartaj M; Kennedy K
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Dec; 32(12):1200-9. PubMed ID: 25398411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors for enhanced valorization of urban organic wastes: Achievements, limitations, energy balance and future perspectives.
    Hu Y; Cai X; Du R; Yang Y; Rong C; Qin Y; Li YY
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 820():153284. PubMed ID: 35066041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance and kinetic study of semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste.
    Sajeena Beevi B; Madhu G; Sahoo DK
    Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():93-7. PubMed ID: 25449607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The valorization of the anaerobic digestate from the organic fractions of municipal solid waste: Challenges and perspectives.
    Cesaro A
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111742. PubMed ID: 33308930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Greenhouse gas emissions from solid waste in Beijing: The rising trend and the mitigation effects by management improvements.
    Yu Y; Zhang W
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Apr; 34(4):368-77. PubMed ID: 26873911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective.
    Fruergaard T; Astrup T
    Waste Manag; 2011 Mar; 31(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 20937557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Potential SRF generation from a closed landfill in northern Italy.
    Passamani G; Ragazzi M; Torretta V
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):157-63. PubMed ID: 26209342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of fuel value and combustion characteristics of two different RDF samples.
    Sever Akdağ A; Atımtay A; Sanin FD
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):217-24. PubMed ID: 26360232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Model development and evaluation of methane potential from anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater sludge and un-dewatered grease trap waste.
    Yalcinkaya S; Malina JF
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():53-62. PubMed ID: 25818384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal, farm, and industrial organic wastes: a survey of recent literature.
    Alatriste-Mondragón F; Samar P; Cox HH; Ahring BK; Iranpour R
    Water Environ Res; 2006 Jun; 78(6):607-36. PubMed ID: 16894987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microalgae-mediated wastewater treatment for biofuels production: A comprehensive review.
    Ali SS; El-Sheekh M; Manni A; Ruiz HA; Elsamahy T; Sun J; Schagerl M
    Microbiol Res; 2022 Dec; 265():127187. PubMed ID: 36202005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.