BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26996644)

  • 1. An Enhancement-focused framework for developing high quality single best answer multiple choice questions.
    AlMahmoud T; Elzubeir MA; Shaban S; Branicki F
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 26996644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tips for developing a valid and reliable bank of multiple choice questions (MCQs).
    Sadaf S; Khan S; Ali SK
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2012; 25(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 23823639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten tips for effective use and quality assurance of multiple-choice questions in knowledge-based assessments.
    Ali K; Zahra D
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2024 May; 28(2):655-662. PubMed ID: 38282273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
    Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Transposition of an American-designed comprehensive medical student examination within the framework of the forthcoming French nationwide comprehensive examination. A preliminary study].
    Fournier JP; De Champlain AF; Benchimol D; Staccini P; Subhiyah R; Braun M; Kohler C; Guidet B; Claudepierre P; Prevel M; Scoles P; Holtzman K; Swanson D; Angelucci K; McGrenra C; Goldberg J; Rampal P; Melnick D
    Ann Med Interne (Paris); 2003 May; 154(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 12910041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
    McCoubrie P
    Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):709-12. PubMed ID: 15763874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of basic medical sciences in an integrated systems-based curriculum.
    Moqattash S; Harris PF; Gumaa KA; Abu-Hijleh MF
    Clin Anat; 1995; 8(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 7712326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot survey of student perceptions on the benefit of the OSCE and MCQ modalities.
    Müller S; Settmacher U; Koch I; Dahmen U
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(4):Doc51. PubMed ID: 30539076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Douthit NT; Norcini J; Mazuz K; Alkan M; Feuerstein MT; Clarfield AM; Dwolatzky T; Solomonov E; Waksman I; Biswas S
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():640204. PubMed ID: 34368038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring examinee behaviours as validity evidence for multiple-choice question examinations.
    Surry LT; Torre D; Durning SJ
    Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 51(10):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 28758233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imprecise terms in UK medical multiple-choice questions: what examiners think they mean.
    Holsgrove G; Elzubeir M
    Med Educ; 1998 Jul; 32(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 9743793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.
    Mee J; Pandian R; Wolczynski J; Morales A; Paniagua M; Harik P; Baldwin P; Clauser BE
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):783-801. PubMed ID: 37665413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Simplified MCQs Interpretation Guide for Faculty.
    Ghayur S; Iqbal M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Aug; 25(8):579-82. PubMed ID: 26305303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.