579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26997248)
1. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013.
Mersereau J; Stanhiser J; Coddington C; Jones T; Luke B; Brown MB
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):750-756. PubMed ID: 28923285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
Tal R; Seifer DB; Wantman E; Baker V; Tal O
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29331235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of single embryo transfer in the United States.
Luke B; Brown MB; Grainger DA; Cedars M; Klein N; Stern JE;
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):490-8. PubMed ID: 19376512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Live birth and multiple birth rates in US in vitro fertilization treatment using donor oocytes: a comparison of single-embryo transfer and double-embryo transfer.
Klenov VE; Boulet SL; Mejia RB; Kissin DM; Munch E; Mancuso A; Van Voorhis BJ
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Sep; 35(9):1657-1664. PubMed ID: 29931407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elective single embryo transfer in women less than age 38 years reduces multiple birth rates, but not live birth rates, in United States fertility clinics.
Mancuso AC; Boulet SL; Duran E; Munch E; Kissin DM; Van Voorhis BJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 27376458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Mneimneh AS; Perkins KM; Jamieson DJ; Zhang Y; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 26604068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority anonymized dataset.
Maheshwari A; Raja EA; Bhattacharya S
Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1703-1708. PubMed ID: 27678031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpregnancy interval and singleton pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer.
Quinn MM; Rosen MP; Allen IE; Huddleston HG; Cedars MI; Fujimoto VY
Fertil Steril; 2019 Jun; 111(6):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 30955846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How compliant are in vitro fertilization member clinics in following embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 59,689 fresh first in vitro fertilization autologous cycles from 2011 to 2012.
Keyhan S; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):645-652.e1. PubMed ID: 27268276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.
Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic indicators of assisted reproduction technology outcomes of cycles with ultralow serum antimüllerian hormone: a multivariate analysis of over 5,000 autologous cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
Seifer DB; Tal O; Wantman E; Edul P; Baker VL
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):385-93.e3. PubMed ID: 26515380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012.
Chang J; Boulet SL; Jeng G; Flowers L; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 26551441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
