158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26997430)
1. Multi-technique imaging of bone metastases: spotlight on PET-CT.
Azad GK; Cook GJ
Clin Radiol; 2016 Jul; 71(7):620-31. PubMed ID: 26997430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases.
Iagaru A; Mittra E; Dick DW; Gambhir SS
Mol Imaging Biol; 2012 Apr; 14(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21479710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastasis in head and neck tumors.
Al-Bulushi NK; Abouzied ME
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 26813992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective study evaluating the relative sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT for detecting skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma in comparison to multidetector CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, using an adaptive trial design.
Gerety EL; Lawrence EM; Wason J; Yan H; Hilborne S; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Shaw AS; Bird N; Fife K; Heard S; Lomas DJ; Matakidou A; Soloviev D; Eisen T; Gallagher FA
Ann Oncol; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2113-8. PubMed ID: 26202597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is (99m)Tc-MDP whole body bone scintigraphy adjuvant to (18)F-FDG-PET for the detection of skeletal metastases?
Sahin E; Zincirkeser S; Akcan AB; Elboga U
J BUON; 2014; 19(1):291-6. PubMed ID: 24659678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic performance of bone scintigraphy and (11)C-Choline PET/CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer].
Garcia JR; Moreno C; Valls E; Cozar P; Bassa P; Soler M; Alvarez-Moro FJ; Moragas M; Riera E
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2015; 34(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 25443648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Bone Metastases between
Wang D; Yang Y; Zeng Z; Ye J; Guo C; Huang S; Guo X; Xiao J
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():5975338. PubMed ID: 35494210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of the Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases: Is It Feasible to Compare 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and 99mTc-methyl Diphosphonate Bone Scintigraphy?
Pietrzak AK; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Urol J; 2018 Sep; 15(5):242-247. PubMed ID: 29681049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial.
Jambor I; Kuisma A; Ramadan S; Huovinen R; Sandell M; Kajander S; Kemppainen J; Kauppila E; Auren J; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Noponen T; Minn H; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25833330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discordant findings in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: absolutely normal bone scans versus disseminated bone metastases on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Ak I; Sivrikoz MC; Entok E; Vardareli E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(4):792-6. PubMed ID: 20015657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of (18) F-FDG-PET-CT and Bone Scintigraphy for Evaluation of Osseous Metastases in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Osteosarcoma.
Hurley C; McCarville MB; Shulkin BL; Mao S; Wu J; Navid F; Daw NC; Pappo AS; Bishop MW
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1381-6. PubMed ID: 27082077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan.
Damle NA; Bal C; Bandopadhyaya GP; Kumar L; Kumar P; Malhotra A; Lata S
Jpn J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 31(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23377765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-individual comparison of
Bénard F; Harsini S; Wilson D; Zukotynski K; Abikhzer G; Turcotte E; Cossette M; Metser U; Romsa J; Martin M; Mar C; Saad F; Soucy JP; Eigl BJ; Black P; Krauze A; Burrell S; Nichol A; Tardif JC
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1499-1507. PubMed ID: 36343655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; Knol RJJ; Burgers AMG; Bos SD; de Jong IJ; Pruim J
World J Urol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29043431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
