178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26998238)
21. The good and the bad of preprint servers in plant physiology.
Kronzucker HJ; Qiu QS; Sonnewald U
J Plant Physiol; 2022 Apr; 271():153661. PubMed ID: 35240511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Goodbye genome paper, hello genome report: the increasing popularity of 'genome announcements' and their impact on science.
Smith DR
Brief Funct Genomics; 2017 May; 16(3):156-162. PubMed ID: 27339634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The preprint debate: What are the issues?
Teixeira da Silva JA
Med J Armed Forces India; 2018 Apr; 74(2):162-164. PubMed ID: 29692484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Popular preprint servers face closure because of money troubles.
Mallapaty S
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7795):349. PubMed ID: 32071446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature.
O'Leary JD; Crawford MW
Can J Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 60(8):813-21. PubMed ID: 23760791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Peer review in a post-eprints world: a proposal.
Till JE
J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(3):E14. PubMed ID: 11720937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomedical science journals in the Arab world.
Tadmouri GO
Saudi Med J; 2004 Oct; 25(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 15494797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The long pilgrimage of Spanish biomedical journals toward excellence. Who helps? Quality, impact and research merit].
Alfonso F
Endocrinol Nutr; 2010 Mar; 57(3):110-20. PubMed ID: 20347618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The relevance of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for medical publishing and research].
Reyes HB
Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 24861118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Free market science.
Nat Cell Biol; 2007 Jul; 9(7):721. PubMed ID: 17603501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A New Science Publishing System for a Budding Science Publishing Crisis.
Fernandez-Patron C; Hardy E
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):805-808. PubMed ID: 28444569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The five deadly sins of science publishing.
Tracz V
F1000Res; 2015; 4():112. PubMed ID: 26097694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preprint publications: waste in haste or pragmatic progress?
Misra DP; Ravindran V
J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2021 Dec; 51(4):324-326. PubMed ID: 34882126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biologists urged to hug a preprint.
Callaway E; Powell K
Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7590):265. PubMed ID: 26887471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact factor and other indices to assess science, scientists and scientific journals.
Satyanarayana K
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010; 54(3):197-212. PubMed ID: 21409860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Biomedical publications in Spain on debate (I): state of neurological journals].
González de Dios J; Sempere AP; Aleixandre-Benavent R
Rev Neurol; 2007 Jan 1-15; 44(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17199227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On Mr. Hyslop's prediction, content archives, and preprint servers.
Berenbaum MR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Apr; 117(17):9131-9134. PubMed ID: 32284425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Indexes for the evaluation of scientific publications: what they are and what they are used for].
Roncon-Albuquerque Júnior R; Leite-Moreira AF
Rev Port Cardiol; 2000 May; 19(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 10916433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Has the time come for preprints in biology?
Bhalla N
Mol Biol Cell; 2016 Apr; 27(8):1185-7. PubMed ID: 27079652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
