These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26998406)

  • 1. Measuring the Photopic Negative Response: Viability of Skin Electrodes and Variability Across Disease Severities in Glaucoma.
    Wu Z; Hadoux X; Fan Gaskin JC; Sarossy MG; Crowston JG
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 5(2):13. PubMed ID: 26998406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photopic Negative Response Obtained Using a Handheld Electroretinogram Device: Determining the Optimal Measure and Repeatability.
    Wu Z; Hadoux X; Hui F; Sarossy MG; Crowston JG
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 5(4):8. PubMed ID: 27540494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
    Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
    Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response.
    Tang J; Hui F; Hadoux X; Sarossy M; van Wijngaarden P; Coote M; Crowston JG
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 7(6):27. PubMed ID: 30619647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship among Photopic Negative Response, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, and Visual Field between Normal and POAG Eyes.
    Shen X; Huang L; Fan N; He J
    ISRN Ophthalmol; 2013; 2013():182021. PubMed ID: 24558598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The photopic negative response as a promising diagnostic tool in glaucoma. A review.
    Kiszkielis M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
    Klin Oczna; 2012; 114(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 23346804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-ocular and inter-session reliability of the electroretinogram photopic negative response (PhNR) in non-human primates.
    Fortune B; Bui BV; Cull G; Wang L; Cioffi GA
    Exp Eye Res; 2004 Jan; 78(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 14667830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between OCT-angiography and photopic negative response in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.
    Tabl AA; Tabl MA
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Jun; 43(6):1889-1901. PubMed ID: 36441346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.
    Mortlock KE; Binns AM; Aldebasi YH; North RV
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 121(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 20607349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing a Portable ERG Device for Glaucoma Clinic: The Effect of Interstimulus Frequency on the Photopic Negative Response.
    Hui F; Tang J; Hadoux X; Coote M; Crowston JG
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 7(6):26. PubMed ID: 30619646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical application of photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open-angle Glaucoma.
    Huang L; Shen X; Fan N; He J
    Eye Sci; 2012 Sep; 27(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 22993054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retinal dysfunction in Parkinson's disease-results of the extended protocol for photopic negative response (PHNR) full-field electroretinogram (ERG).
    Polat OA; Gultekin M; Sener H; Ozer F; Arda H
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Oct; 147(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 37515709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.
    Joshi NR; Ly E; Viswanathan S
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28508299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Test-Retest Reliability of the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR).
    Tang J; Edwards T; Crowston JG; Sarossy M
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 3(6):1. PubMed ID: 25374770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Photopic Negative Response of Flash Electroretinography in Ganglion Cell Complex Assessment in Glaucoma Patients.
    Awwad MH; Nada O; Hamdi MM; El-Shazly AAE; Elwan S
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():893-904. PubMed ID: 35356699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of inner retinal function at different stages of primary open angle glaucoma using the photopic negative response (PhNR) measured by RETeval electroretinography.
    Hidaka T; Chuman H; Ikeda Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 262(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 37535182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significant correlations between focal photopic negative response and focal visual sensitivity and ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucomatous eyes.
    Ishizuka M; Machida S; Hara Y; Tada A; Ebihara S; Gonmori M; Nishimura T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 66(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 34843022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.