These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2699879)

  • 1. [Enamel abrasion and enamel tears by porcelain brackets].
    Newesely H; Rossiwall B
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1989; 21(4):577-94. PubMed ID: 2699879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment.
    Viazis AD; DeLong R; Bevis RR; Rudney JD; Pintado MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 2378315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
    Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel.
    Eliades T; Viazis AD; Lekka M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8322720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluations on thermal debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Sernetz F; Kraut J
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 1812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications.
    Bishara SE; Trulove TS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 2206042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets.
    Kitahara-Céia FM; Mucha JN; Marques dos Santos PA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 18929273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets.
    Toroglu MS; Yaylali S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):181e1-7. PubMed ID: 18675197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Enamel wear from ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets].
    Viazis AD
    Orthod Epitheor; 1989 Dec; 1(4):167-74. PubMed ID: 2486317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro.
    Suliman SN; Trojan TM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):651-6. PubMed ID: 25264580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Problems associated with ceramic brackets suggest limiting use to selected teeth.
    Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1626749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.