261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26999385)
1. Optimal flexible sample size design with robust power.
Zhang L; Cui L; Yang B
Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3385-96. PubMed ID: 26999385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal adaptive group sequential design with flexible timing of sample size determination.
Cui L; Zhang L; Yang B
Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 63():8-12. PubMed ID: 28455234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size adjustment designs with time-to-event outcomes: A caution.
Freidlin B; Korn EL
Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 28795844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Group sequential designs with prospectively planned rules for subpopulation enrichment.
Rosenblum M; Luber B; Thompson RE; Hanley D
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3776-91. PubMed ID: 27076411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Group sequential and discretized sample size re-estimation designs: a comparison of flexibility.
Wu X; Cui L
Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(24):2844-57. PubMed ID: 22733405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information-based sample size re-estimation in group sequential design for longitudinal trials.
Zhou J; Adewale A; Shentu Y; Liu J; Anderson K
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3801-14. PubMed ID: 24797715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An objective re-evaluation of adaptive sample size re-estimation: commentary on 'Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs'.
Mehta C; Liu L
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):350-8. PubMed ID: 26757953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the efficiency of adaptive sample size design.
Cui L; Zhang L
Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):933-944. PubMed ID: 30450621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal promising zone designs.
Hsiao ST; Liu L; Mehta CR
Biom J; 2019 Sep; 61(5):1175-1186. PubMed ID: 30411405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods for flexible sample-size design in clinical trials: Likelihood, weighted, dual test, and promising zone approaches.
Shih WJ; Li G; Wang Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Mar; 47():40-8. PubMed ID: 26674739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive sample size modification in clinical trials: start small then ask for more?
Jennison C; Turnbull BW
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3793-810. PubMed ID: 26172385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal adaptive promising zone designs.
Mehta C; Bhingare A; Liu L; Senchaudhuri P
Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1950-1970. PubMed ID: 35165917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive designs at European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) with a focus on adaptive sample size re-estimation based on interim-effect size.
Mauer M; Collette L; Bogaerts J;
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jun; 48(9):1386-91. PubMed ID: 22281098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for variation in the required sample size in the design of group-sequential trials.
Grayling MJ; Mander AP
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106459. PubMed ID: 34082076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the adaptive performance of flexible sample size designs with treatment difference in an interval.
Liu GF; Zhu GR; Cui L
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 17634972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient adaptive designs with mid-course sample size adjustment in clinical trials.
Bartroff J; Lai TL
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1593-611. PubMed ID: 18275090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reasonable two-stage adaptive designs for single-arm phase II clinical trials.
Kashiwabara K; Matsuyama Y
Pharm Stat; 2018 Nov; 17(6):770-780. PubMed ID: 30168250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.
Jennison C; Turnbull BW
Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 16220524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design.
Mütze T; Friede T
Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3636-3653. PubMed ID: 28608469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
