These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26999427)

  • 1. Establishing Standards for Side-by-Side Radiographic Comparisons.
    Ross AH; Lanfear AK; Maxwell AB
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2016 Jun; 37(2):86-94. PubMed ID: 26999427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A radiographic study on the utility of cranial vault outlines for positive identifications.
    Maxwell AB; Ross AH
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 24745071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal identification by radiographic comparison: blind tests of a morphoscopic method using antemortem chest radiographs.
    Stephan CN; Winburn AP; Christensen AF; Tyrrell AJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):320-32. PubMed ID: 21306373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic human identification using bones of the hand: a validation study.
    Koot MG; Sauer NJ; Fenton TW
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 15813535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
    Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of unknown human remains by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs.
    Jablonski NG; Shum BS
    Forensic Sci Int; 1989 Aug; 42(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 2792981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs.
    Angyal M; Dérczy K
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1089-93. PubMed ID: 9729833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting office radiographs. A guide to systematic evaluation.
    Halvorsen JG; Swanson D
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Dec; 31(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 2246634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a computer-assisted forensic radiographic identification method using the lateral cervical and lumbar spine.
    Derrick SM; Raxter MH; Hipp JA; Goel P; Chan EF; Love JC; Wiersema JM; Akella NS
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24961154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.
    Ames CP; Smith JS; Eastlack R; Blaskiewicz DJ; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Bess S; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Gupta M; O'Brien M; Hostin R; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis TS; Fu KM; Hart R; Albert TJ; Riew KD; Fehlings MG; Deviren V; Lafage V;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 26273762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic comparison of the lumbar spine for positive identification of human remains. A case report.
    Valenzuela A
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1997 Jun; 18(2):215-7. PubMed ID: 9185947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of bone trabeculae to establish positive identification.
    Mann RW
    Forensic Sci Int; 1998 Nov; 98(1-2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10036762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial suture patterns.
    Rogers TL; Allard TT
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Mar; 49(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 15027532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
    Griffin MG; Rupich RC; Avioli LV; Pacifici R
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1991 Dec; 73(6):1164-9. PubMed ID: 1955496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervicothoracic junction in disaster victim identification: Idiosyncrasies and relevance of body position for advanced chest radiograph comparisons.
    Stephan CN; Caple JM; D'Alonzo Jaques SS; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1587-1603. PubMed ID: 38037703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Football protective gear and cervical spine imaging.
    Davidson RM; Burton JH; Snowise M; Owens WB
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jul; 38(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 11423808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical Note: Individuals identified by radiographic comparison: A sample of demographics and the region of body used for identification in Clark County, Nevada, USA (2017-2020).
    Flaherty TM; Byrnes JF
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Feb; 355():111933. PubMed ID: 38277915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic identification using midline medical sternotomy wires.
    Fleischman JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 25428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dento-maxillo-facial radiology as an aid to human identification.
    Raitz R; Fenyo-Pereira M; Hayashi AS; Melani R
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2005 Dec; 23(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 16353757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new experimental approach to computer-aided face/skull identification in forensic anthropology.
    Ricci A; Marella GL; Apostol MA
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2006 Mar; 27(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 16501348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.