BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26999777)

  • 1. Sexual antagonism and meiotic drive cause stable linkage disequilibrium and favour reduced recombination on the X chromosome.
    Rydzewski WT; Carioscia SA; Liévano G; Lynch VD; Patten MM
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 29(6):1247-56. PubMed ID: 26999777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus.
    Patten MM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2360-70. PubMed ID: 25293344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.
    Patten MM; Ubeda F; Haig D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Nov; 280(1770):20131795. PubMed ID: 24026821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stable linkage disequilibrium owing to sexual antagonism.
    Ubeda F; Haig D; Patten MM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Mar; 278(1707):855-62. PubMed ID: 20861051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haploid Selection Favors Suppressed Recombination Between Sex Chromosomes Despite Causing Biased Sex Ratios.
    Scott MF; Otto SP
    Genetics; 2017 Dec; 207(4):1631-1649. PubMed ID: 29051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex-specific recombination rates and allele frequencies affect the invasion of sexually antagonistic variation on autosomes.
    Wyman MJ; Wyman MC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Nov; 26(11):2428-37. PubMed ID: 24070143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic linkage between a sexually selected trait and X chromosome meiotic drive.
    Johns PM; Wolfenbarger LL; Wilkinson GS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Oct; 272(1576):2097-103. PubMed ID: 16191622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The intricate relationship between sexually antagonistic selection and the evolution of sex chromosome fusions.
    Matsumoto T; Kitano J
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Sep; 404():97-108. PubMed ID: 27259387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occasional recombination of a selfish X-chromosome may permit its persistence at high frequencies in the wild.
    Pieper KE; Dyer KA
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2229-2241. PubMed ID: 27423061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism.
    Albert AY; Otto SP
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5745):119-21. PubMed ID: 16210543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium.
    Patten MM; Haig D; Ubeda F
    Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3638-42. PubMed ID: 20722728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maintenance or loss of genetic variation under sexual and parental antagonism at a sex-linked locus.
    Patten MM; Haig D
    Evolution; 2009 Nov; 63(11):2888-95. PubMed ID: 19573084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why Do Sex Chromosomes Stop Recombining?
    Ponnikas S; Sigeman H; Abbott JK; Hansson B
    Trends Genet; 2018 Jul; 34(7):492-503. PubMed ID: 29716744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The advantage of recombination when selection is acting at many genetic Loci.
    Hickey DA; Golding GB
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Apr; 442():123-128. PubMed ID: 29355539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular population genetics of X-linked genes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kovacevic M; Schaeffer SW
    Genetics; 2000 Sep; 156(1):155-72. PubMed ID: 10978282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specialists and generalists: the sexual ecology of the genome.
    Haig D; Úbeda F; Patten MM
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2014 Jul; 6(9):a017525. PubMed ID: 25059710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extensive Recombination Suppression and Epistatic Selection Causes Chromosome-Wide Differentiation of a Selfish Sex Chromosome in
    Fuller ZL; Koury SA; Leonard CJ; Young RE; Ikegami K; Westlake J; Richards S; Schaeffer SW; Phadnis N
    Genetics; 2020 Sep; 216(1):205-226. PubMed ID: 32732371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of polymorphic transposable elements on linkage disequilibrium along chromosomes.
    Choudhury RR; Rogivue A; Gugerli F; Parisod C
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Mar; 28(6):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 30633406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective sweeps in a 2-locus model for sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans.
    Derome N; Baudry E; Ogereau D; Veuille M; Montchamp-Moreau C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 18071199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.