208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26999810)
1. Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.
Elmore JG; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Tosteson AN; Geller B; Onega T; Carney PA; Jackson SL; Allison KH; Weaver DL
Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):649-55. PubMed ID: 26999810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathologists' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study.
Elmore JG; Barnhill RL; Elder DE; Longton GM; Pepe MS; Reisch LM; Carney PA; Titus LJ; Nelson HD; Onega T; Tosteson ANA; Weinstock MA; Knezevich SR; Piepkorn MW
BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2813. PubMed ID: 28659278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.
Brunyé TT; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Feb; 66():171-179. PubMed ID: 28087402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?
Jackson SL; Frederick PD; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Allison KH; Carney PA; Geller BM; Tosteson AN; Onega T; Elmore JG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241. PubMed ID: 27913946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Randomized Study Comparing Digital Imaging to Traditional Glass Slide Microscopy for Breast Biopsy and Cancer Diagnosis.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Pepe MS; Carney PA; Nelson HD; Allison KH; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Mercan E; Shapiro LG; Brunyé TT; Morgan TR; Weaver DL
J Pathol Inform; 2017; 8():12. PubMed ID: 28382226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Disease Severity of Preceding Clinical Cases on Pathologists' Medical Decision Making.
Frederick PD; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Brunyé TT; Allison KH; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Med Decis Making; 2017 Jan; 37(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 27037007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs.
Tosteson ANA; Yang Q; Nelson HD; Longton G; Soneji SS; Pepe M; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Elmore JG; Weaver DL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 28879558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.
Carney PA; Allison KH; Oster NV; Frederick PD; Morgan TR; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 27056072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.
Samples LS; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Nelson HD; Morgan TR; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():34-43. PubMed ID: 28475933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mouse cursor movement and eye tracking data as an indicator of pathologists' attention when viewing digital whole slide images.
Raghunath V; Braxton MO; Gagnon SA; Brunyé TT; Allison KH; Reisch LM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG; Shapiro LG
J Pathol Inform; 2012; 3():43. PubMed ID: 23372984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathologists' agreement with experts and reproducibility of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ classification schemes.
Wells WA; Carney PA; Eliassen MS; Grove MR; Tosteson AN
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 May; 24(5):651-9. PubMed ID: 10800983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Allison KH; Abraham LA; Weaver DL; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Onega T; Geller BM; Kerlikowske K; Carney PA; Ichikawa LE; Buist DS; Elmore JG
Cancer; 2015 May; 121(9):1369-78. PubMed ID: 25603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic concordance of breast pathologists: lessons from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Pathology External Quality Assurance Scheme.
Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Aleskandarany MA; Hodi Z; Lee AH; Pinder SE; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2017 Mar; 70(4):632-642. PubMed ID: 28028831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.
Nagarkar DB; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Brunyé TT; Carney PA; Rendi MH; Beck AH; Frederick PD; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1004-11. PubMed ID: 27198567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).
Kluttig A; Trocchi P; Heinig A; Holzhausen HJ; Taege C; Hauptmann S; Boecker W; Decker T; Loening T; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Thomssen C; Lantzsch T; Buchmann J; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17570833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
