These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27000285)

  • 1. Temporal mammogram image registration using optimized curvilinear coordinates.
    Abdel-Nasser M; Moreno A; Puig D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():1-14. PubMed ID: 27000285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.
    Sanjay-Gopal S; Chan HP; Wilson T; Helvie M; Petrick N; Sahiner B
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 10619252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of methods for mammogram registration.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren P; Hendriks J; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1436-44. PubMed ID: 14606677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated registration of breast lesions in temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis--local affine transformation for improved localization.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1070-9. PubMed ID: 11439476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammogram registration: a phantom-based evaluation of compressed breast thickness variation effects.
    Richard FJ; Bakić PR; Maidment AD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 16468453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Review of Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Sequential Mammograms.
    Loizidou K; Skouroumouni G; Nikolaou C; Pitris C
    Tomography; 2022 Dec; 8(6):2874-2892. PubMed ID: 36548533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated registration of diagnostic to prediagnostic x-ray mammograms: evaluation and comparison to radiologists' accuracy.
    Pinto Pereira SM; Hipwell JH; McCormack VA; Tanner C; Moss SM; Wilkinson LS; Khoo LA; Pagliari C; Skippage PL; Kliger CJ; Hawkes DJ; Silva IM
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4530-9. PubMed ID: 20964170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
    Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis.
    Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new idea for visualization of lesions distribution in mammogram based on CPD registration method.
    Pan X; Qi B; Yu H; Wei H; Kang Y
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Jul; 25(S1):459-467. PubMed ID: 28582934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.
    Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Cardoso MJ; Zhang X; Tanner C; Ourselin S; Bick U; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 22513136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests.
    Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):709-727. PubMed ID: 28582938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A similarity measure method combining location feature for mammogram retrieval.
    Wang Z; Xin J; Huang Y; Li C; Xu L; Li Y; Zhang H; Gu H; Qian W
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(4):553-571. PubMed ID: 29865106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
    Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences.
    Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 15957600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intensity-based hierarchical elastic registration using approximating splines.
    Serifovic-Trbalic A; Demirovic D; Cattin PC
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jan; 9(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 23793721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach.
    Dheeba J; Albert Singh N; Tamil Selvi S
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Jun; 49():45-52. PubMed ID: 24509074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.