These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27000672)

  • 1. [Investigation of an Optimum Determination Method of Exposure Index for Posterior-Anterior Chest Radiographs Using an Auto Exposure Control].
    Yanagita S; Imahana M; Gomi T; Nishiki M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 27000672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Influence of interest region and interest value settings on exposure index-analysis using chest clinical images].
    Nakamae M; Miyajima Y; Nakano T; Kitanaka Y; Okura Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1250-7. PubMed ID: 25410331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
    Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
    Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT.
    Paul NS; Blobel J; Prezelj E; Burey P; Ursani A; Menezes RJ; Kashani H; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1363-80. PubMed ID: 20145292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel registration method for interval change detection between two chest X-ray images with different rotation angles.
    Shimizu A; Matsuo Y; Kobatake H
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 16554231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
    Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
    Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
    Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiologic study of the thorax using the digital method (FCR 101). Evaluation of various parameters as related to exposure].
    Perri G; Battolla L; Palla L; D'Alessandro F; Torri T; Tagliagambe A
    Radiol Med; 1991; 82(1-2):84-8. PubMed ID: 1896586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Study on the effect of setting the region of interest for exposure index computing].
    Hirose S; Matsuzawa H; Hirose A; Kawamoto K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Jan; 71(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25672532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt (kV)-selection in computed tomography of the chest: effects on radiation exposure and image quality.
    Eller A; Wuest W; Scharf M; Brand M; Achenbach S; Uder M; Lell MM
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2386-91. PubMed ID: 24050878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of digital radiography processing parameters on digital chest radiograph for occupational exposed workers].
    Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Yuan HS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 May; 31(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 23803524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DigiBit: A System for Adjusting Radiographic Exposure Factors in the Digital Era.
    Ching W; Robinson J; McEntee MF
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 26199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.