109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27001711)
1. Evaluation of Audiometric Thresholds and Speech Perception Sentence Test in Adults and Elderly After Cochlear Implantation.
Carvalho GM; Santos MD; Pauna HF; Guimarães AC; Curi SB; Jeronymo D; Porto PR; Bianchini WA; Castilho AM; Sartorato EL
Curr Aging Sci; 2016; 9(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 27001711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.
Léger AC; Moore BC; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 23104012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expanding unilateral cochlear implantation criteria for adults with bilateral acquired severe sensorineural hearing loss.
Huinck WJ; Mylanus EAM; Snik AFM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 276(5):1313-1320. PubMed ID: 30810818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: Audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation.
Leigh JR; Dettman SJ; Dowell RC
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S9-S18. PubMed ID: 27142630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of audiometric measures and challenges in long-term management of the elderly cochlear implant patient.
Spitzer JB; Cellum IP; Bosworth C
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec; 34(9):1636-41. PubMed ID: 24136306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing benefit of patients after Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
Todt I; Seidl RO; Ernst A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2005; 67(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 16088247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The first results of a totally implanted active middle ear device.
Peixoto MDC; Miranda C; Bento M; Oliveira S; Pratas R; Correia da Silva V
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2775-2781. PubMed ID: 31342145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of audiometric configuration on speech-band thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss subjects.
Surr RK; Seidman JH; Schwartz DM; Mueller HG
Ear Hear; 1982; 3(5):246-50. PubMed ID: 7141137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implantation in patients deafened by ototoxic drugs.
Nichani J; Bruce IA; Mawman D; Khwaja S; Ramsden R; Green K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Sep; 14(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 23510699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Retrospective analysis of auditory neuropathy patients after cochlear implantation].
Ji F; Wang Q; Chen AT; Hong MD; Li JN; Zhao H; Yang SM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 29614552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral Ménière's syndrome.
Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Niparko JK; Minor LB
Otol Neurotol; 2003 May; 24(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 12806291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
