These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27002688)

  • 1. Choice in transition: Replication and extension to preschool children in a naturalistic setting.
    Martens BK; Lambert TL; Sullivan WE; Magnuson JD; Morley AJ; Sallade SJ; Baxter EL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):307-21. PubMed ID: 27002688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement: A translational study of risky choice.
    Mullane MP; Martens BK; Baxter EL; Steeg DV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 28078680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law.
    Borrero CS; Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Bourret JC; Sloman KN; Samaha AL; Dallery J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 21119856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.
    Anderson KG; Velkey AJ; Woolverton WL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):319-26. PubMed ID: 12373433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.
    Ziriax JM; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 16812360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice.
    Graff RB; Libby ME
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 10396769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice in a variable environment: visit patterns in the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):85-127. PubMed ID: 15113135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CR
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
    Jiménez AA; Aparicio CF
    Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19615608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of choice as a reinforcer for typically developing children.
    Ackerlund Brandt JA; Dozier CL; Juanico JF; Laudont CL; Mick BR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):344-62. PubMed ID: 25916749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.
    Harding JW; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Cooper LJ; Asmus J; Mlela K; Muller J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 10201104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 22414348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Aase H; Sagvolden T
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 May; 47(5):457-71. PubMed ID: 16671929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How should periods without social interaction be scheduled? Children's preference for practical schedules of positive reinforcement.
    Luczynski KC; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):500-22. PubMed ID: 24890928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaired behavior regulation under conditions of concurrent variable schedules of reinforcement in children with ADHD.
    Taylor D; Lincoln AJ; Foster SL
    J Atten Disord; 2010 Jan; 13(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 19520999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.