160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27003145)
1. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.
Sussman DA; Deshpande AR; Shankar U; Barkin JA; Medina AM; Poppiti RJ; Cubeddu LX; Barkin JS
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Aug; 61(8):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 27003145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study of disposable alligator-jaw biopsy forceps for gastric mucosal biopsy.
Abudayyeh S; Hoffman J; El-Zimaity HT; Graham DY
Dig Liver Dis; 2009 May; 41(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 18799373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study.
Woods KL; Anand BS; Cole RA; Osato MS; Genta RM; Malaty H; Gurer IE; Rossi DD
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 9925695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An observer-blinded, prospective, randomized comparison of forceps for endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Schafer TW; Hollis-Perry KM; Mondragon RM; Brann OS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11818921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16 different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Danesh BJ; Burke M; Newman J; Aylott A; Whitfield P; Cotton PB
Gut; 1985 Mar; 26(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 3972269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adequacy of mucosal sampling with the "two-bite" forceps technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
Padda S; Shah I; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 12556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of endoscopic forceps on quality of duodenal mucosal biopsy in healthy dogs.
Goutal-Landry CM; Mansell J; Ryan KA; Gaschen FP
J Vet Intern Med; 2013; 27(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 23600705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle.
Bernstein DE; Barkin JS; Reiner DK; Lubin J; Phillips RS; Grauer L
Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Jun; 41(6):573-6. PubMed ID: 7672551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Martinek J; Maluskova J; Stefanova M; Tuckova I; Suchanek S; Vackova Z; Krajciova J; Kollar M; Zavoral M; Spicak J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5328-35. PubMed ID: 25954107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC
Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of three types of biopsy forceps in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.
Dolwani S; Saleem H; Thompson IW; Allison MC
Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):946-9. PubMed ID: 12471536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a new jumbo forceps improves tissue acquisition of Barrett's esophagus surveillance biopsies.
Komanduri S; Swanson G; Keefer L; Jakate S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Dec; 70(6):1072-8.e1. PubMed ID: 19595312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, randomized comparison of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Yang R; Naritoku W; Laine L
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7859962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens.
Elmunzer BJ; Higgins PD; Kwon YM; Golembeski C; Greenson JK; Korsnes SJ; Elta GH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Aug; 68(2):273-8; quiz 334, 336. PubMed ID: 18155204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does a small biopsied gastric specimen limit the usage of two directional transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?
Rhee KH; Han HS; Lee SY; Seo TH; Ko SY; Kim BK; Sung IK; Jin CJ; Min YI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Feb; 25(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 19968748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-institutional Evaluation of Upper Urinary Tract Biopsy Using Backloaded Cup Biopsy Forceps, a Nitinol Basket, and Standard Cup Biopsy Forceps.
Lama DJ; Safiullah S; Patel RM; Lee TK; Balani JP; Zhang L; Okhunov Z; Margulis V; Savage SJ; Uchio E; Landman J
Urology; 2018 Jul; 117():89-94. PubMed ID: 29630955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps.
Fantin AC; Neuweiler J; Binek JS; Suter WR; Meyenberger C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Nov; 54(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 11677476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.
Cartwright JA; Hill TL; Smith S; Shaw D
J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 30(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 27255591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of disposable endoscopic forceps according to the manufacturing techniques.
Kwon CI; Kim G; Moon JP; Yun H; Ko WJ; Cho JY; Hong SP
Korean J Intern Med; 2019 May; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 29502363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.
Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
