These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27003311)

  • 1. Categorical variables with many categories are preferentially selected in bootstrap-based model selection procedures for multivariable regression models.
    Rospleszcz S; Janitza S; Boulesteix AL
    Biom J; 2016 May; 58(3):652-73. PubMed ID: 27003311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bootstrap model selection had similar performance for selecting authentic and noise variables compared to backward variable elimination: a simulation study.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1009-17.e1. PubMed ID: 18539429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subsampling versus bootstrapping in resampling-based model selection for multivariable regression.
    De Bin R; Janitza S; Sauerbrei W; Boulesteix AL
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):272-80. PubMed ID: 26288150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitfalls of hypothesis tests and model selection on bootstrap samples: Causes and consequences in biometrical applications.
    Janitza S; Binder H; Boulesteix AL
    Biom J; 2016 May; 58(3):447-73. PubMed ID: 26372408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability of multivariable fractional polynomial models with selection of variables and transformations: a bootstrap investigation.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):639-59. PubMed ID: 12590419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated variable selection methods for logistic regression produced unstable models for predicting acute myocardial infarction mortality.
    Austin PC; Tu JV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1138-46. PubMed ID: 15567629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On studentising and blocklength selection for the bootstrap on time series.
    Peifer M; Schelter B; Guschlbauer B; Hellwig B; Lücking CH; Timmer J
    Biom J; 2005 Jun; 47(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 16053258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable selection under multiple imputation using the bootstrap in a prognostic study.
    Heymans MW; van Buuren S; Knol DL; van Mechelen W; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():33. PubMed ID: 17629912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for marginal independence between two categorical variables with multiple responses.
    Bilder CR; Loughin TM
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 15032795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3286-300. PubMed ID: 17940997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On stability issues in deriving multivariable regression models.
    Sauerbrei W; Buchholz A; Boulesteix AL; Binder H
    Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):531-55. PubMed ID: 25501529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple pooling method for variable selection in multiply imputed datasets outperformed complex methods.
    Panken AM; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):214. PubMed ID: 35927610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the accuracy and stability of variable selection methods for random forest modeling in ecology.
    Fox EW; Hill RA; Leibowitz SG; Olsen AR; Thornbrugh DJ; Weber MH
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jul; 189(7):316. PubMed ID: 28589457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the bootstrap and monotone likelihood in the cox proportional hazards regression model.
    Loughin TM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1998; 4(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 9880996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decomposition and model selection for large contingency tables.
    Dahinden C; Kalisch M; Bühlmann P
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):233-52. PubMed ID: 20213739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variable selection for clustering with Gaussian mixture models.
    Maugis C; Celeux G; Martin-Magniette ML
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 19210744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of variables for multivariable models: Opportunities and limitations in quantifying model stability by resampling.
    Wallisch C; Dunkler D; Rauch G; de Bin R; Heinze G
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):369-381. PubMed ID: 33089538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation on the improvement of prediction by bootstrap model averaging.
    Holländer N; Augustin NH; Sauerbrei W
    Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 16482369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis with selection of variables.
    Snapinn SM; Knoke JD
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):289-99. PubMed ID: 2720056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variable selection in Bayesian generalized linear-mixed models: an illustration using candidate gene case-control association studies.
    Tsai MY
    Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):234-53. PubMed ID: 25267186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.