478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27004628)
1. Comparison of physical activity assessed using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers.
Kamada M; Shiroma EJ; Harris TB; Lee IM
Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():23-8. PubMed ID: 27004628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of sampling rate on acceleration and counts of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers in children.
Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Mackintosh KA; McNarry MA; Brønd J; Arvidsson D; Montoye AHK
Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(9):095008. PubMed ID: 31518999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.
Rowlands AV; Rennie K; Kozarski R; Stanley RM; Eston RG; Parfitt GC; Olds TS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calibration and Validation of a Wrist- and Hip-Worn Actigraph Accelerometer in 4-Year-Old Children.
Johansson E; Larisch LM; Marcus C; Hagströmer M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162436. PubMed ID: 27617962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Sedentary Estimates between activPAL and Hip- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph.
Koster A; Shiroma EJ; Caserotti P; Matthews CE; Chen KY; Glynn NW; Harris TB
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 27031744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Staudenmayer J; Lanckriet G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26673126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Wrist Accelerometry Suitable for Threshold Scoring? A Comparison of Hip-Worn and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Data in Low-Active Older Adults With Obesity.
Fanning J; Miller ME; Chen SH; Davids C; Kershner K; Rejeski WJ
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2022 Dec; 77(12):2429-2434. PubMed ID: 34791237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.
Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Montoye AHK
J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2794-2802. PubMed ID: 32755446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Daily physical activity patterns from hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers.
Shiroma EJ; Schepps MA; Harezlak J; Chen KY; Matthews CE; Koster A; Caserotti P; Glynn NW; Harris TB
Physiol Meas; 2016 Oct; 37(10):1852-1861. PubMed ID: 27654140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wrist-specific accelerometry methods for estimating free-living physical activity.
Kingsley MIC; Nawaratne R; O'Halloran PD; Montoye AHK; Alahakoon D; De Silva D; Staley K; Nicholson M
J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Jun; 22(6):677-683. PubMed ID: 30558904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer.
Choi L; Ward SC; Schnelle JF; Buchowski MS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Oct; 44(10):2009-16. PubMed ID: 22525772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wear Compliance and Activity in Children Wearing Wrist- and Hip-Mounted Accelerometers.
Fairclough SJ; Noonan R; Rowlands AV; Van Hees V; Knowles Z; Boddy LM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Feb; 48(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26375253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining accelerometer validity for estimating physical activity in pre-schoolers during free-living activity.
Dobell AP; Eyre ELJ; Tallis J; Chinapaw MJM; Altenburg TM; Duncan MJ
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Oct; 29(10):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 31206785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison Between Wrist-Worn and Waist-Worn Accelerometry.
Loprinzi PD; Smith B
J Phys Act Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):539-545. PubMed ID: 28290761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
Bakrania K; Yates T; Rowlands AV; Esliger DW; Bunnewell S; Sanders J; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
