379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27005515)
1. Impact of surgeon annual volume on short-term maternal outcome in cesarean delivery.
Drukker L; Hants Y; Farkash R; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Shen O; Samueloff A; Sela HY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):85.e1-8. PubMed ID: 27005515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of operative vaginal delivery managed by residents under supervision and attending obstetricians: a prospective cross-sectional study.
Sentilhes L; Madar H; Ducarme G; Hamel JF; Mattuizzi A; Hanf M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):59.e1-59.e15. PubMed ID: 30807764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obstetrician volume as a potentially modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery.
Clapp MA; Melamed A; Robinson JN; Shah N; Little SE
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 124(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 25198280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prolonged operative time of repeat cesarean is a risk marker for post-operative maternal complications.
Rottenstreich M; Sela HY; Shen O; Michaelson-Cohen R; Samueloff A; Reichman O
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Dec; 18(1):477. PubMed ID: 30514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The association of skin-incision type at cesarean with maternal and neonatal morbidity for women with multiple prior cesarean deliveries.
Palatnik A; Grobman WA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():121-4. PubMed ID: 26117440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.
Almeida MA; Araujo Júnior E; Camano L; Peixoto AB; Martins WP; Mattar R
Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 29510632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes among obstetrics trainees.
Aiken CE; Aiken AR; Park H; Brockelsby JC; Prentice A
Med Educ; 2015 Jul; 49(7):674-83. PubMed ID: 26077215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The transition from latent to active labor and adverse obstetrical outcomes.
Rosenbloom JI; Woolfolk CL; Wan L; Stout MJ; Tuuli MG; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):487.e1-487.e8. PubMed ID: 31153930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prolonged operative time of cesarean is a risk marker for subsequent cesarean maternal complications.
Lang Ben Nun E; Sela HY; Joseph J; Rudelson G; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Rottenstreich M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 307(3):739-746. PubMed ID: 35488051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.
Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 16880297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early pregnancy dispositional optimism and pregnancy outcomes among nulliparous people.
Ayala NK; Fain AC; Cersonsky TEK; Werner EF; Miller ES; Clark MA; Lewkowitz AK
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101155. PubMed ID: 37734660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urinary bladder injury during cesarean delivery: Maternal outcome from a contemporary large case series.
Salman L; Aharony S; Shmueli A; Wiznitzer A; Chen R; Gabbay-Benziv R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jun; 213():26-30. PubMed ID: 28411456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal predelivery hemoglobin to reduce transfusion and adverse perinatal outcomes.
Cozzi GD; Blanchard CT; Edwards JT; Szychowski JM; Subramaniam A; Battarbee AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Feb; 5(2):100810. PubMed ID: 36379441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Singleton, Term, Vertex Cesarean Delivery on a Midwife Service Compared With an Obstetrician Service.
Damiano EA; Auty SG; Von Mertens J; Gerjevic KA
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 135(6):1353-1361. PubMed ID: 32459427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association between hospital-level cesarean delivery rates and severe maternal morbidity and unexpected newborn complications.
Clapp MA; James KE; Little SE; Robinson JN; Kaimal AJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Nov; 3(6):100474. PubMed ID: 34481997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital volume, provider volume, and complications after childbirth in U.S. hospitals.
Janakiraman V; Lazar J; Joynt KE; Jha AK
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 118(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 21826039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
