These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2700552)

  • 21. A simple, predictable intraoral technique for retentive mechanism attachment of implant overdenture attachments.
    Daher T
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 14508743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fabrication of custom clips for bar-and-clip attachments for implant-supported overdentures.
    Bolouri A; Zartman RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):379-80. PubMed ID: 17098504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Force transmission in bar-retained implant-stabilised mandibular over-dentures: an in-vitro study.
    el-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 12526275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of retention characteristics in prefabricated and custom-cast dental attachments.
    Fu CC; Hsu YT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 19432765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anterior implant-supported overdentures.
    Ben-Ur Z; Gorfil C; Shifman A
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):603-6. PubMed ID: 9180417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of resistance form on attachment strength of resin-retained castings.
    Wilkes PW; Shillingburg HT; Johnson DL
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 2000; 90(3):16-20, 22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 11314309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Functional impression and jaw registration: a single session procedure for the construction of complete dentures.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Kettner N; Reppert G; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):554-61. PubMed ID: 15189312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of two implant systems for providing implant supported overdentures in the mandible--a clinical appraisal.
    Davis DM; Watson RM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 7920396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When to choose which retention element to use for removable dental prostheses.
    Zitzmann NU; Rohner U; Weiger R; Krastl G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19418863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fabrication of a maxillary implant-supported overdenture retained by two cemented bars: a clinical report.
    Uludag B; Sahin V; Celik G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 17547940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maxillary zirconia implant fixed partial dentures opposing an acrylic resin implant fixed complete denture: a two-year clinical report.
    Chang PP; Henegbarth EA; Lang LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 17618914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.