These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27005839)

  • 1. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
    Lewis M; Elwyn G; Wood F
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):454-60. PubMed ID: 12939890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.
    Dale J; Potter R; Owen K; Leach J
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():84. PubMed ID: 27439982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GP appraisal: an evaluation of generational differences on the utility of GP appraisal.
    Hopayian K; Sherifi J
    Educ Prim Care; 2020 Nov; 31(6):371-376. PubMed ID: 32862790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.
    Finlay K; McLaren S
    Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20051189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. General practitioners, revalidation and appraisal: a cross sectional survey of attitudes, beliefs and concerns in Lincolnshire.
    Middlemass J; Siriwardena AN
    Med Educ; 2003 Sep; 37(9):778-85. PubMed ID: 12950940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
    Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re-licensing of general practitioners using the current UK revalidation proposals: a cross sectional study.
    Charlton R; Coomber J; Thistlethwaite JE
    Postgrad Med J; 2011 Dec; 87(1034):807-13. PubMed ID: 22021445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GP experiences of partner and external peer appraisal: a qualitative study.
    McKinstry B; Peacock H; Shaw J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):539-43. PubMed ID: 16004740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.
    Davies H; Khera N; Stroobant J
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15665172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
    Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do doctors really think about the relevance and impact of GP appraisal 3 years on? A survey of Scottish GPs.
    Colthart I; Cameron N; McKinstry B; Blaney D
    Br J Gen Pract; 2008 Feb; 58(547):82-7. PubMed ID: 18307850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers and attitudes influencing non-engagement in a peer feedback model to inform evidence for GP appraisal.
    Curnock E; Bowie P; Pope L; McKay J
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22443714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revalidation - a personal reflection.
    Dawda P
    Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):826-8. PubMed ID: 24217109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insightful practice: a reliable measure for medical revalidation.
    Murphy DJ; Guthrie B; Sullivan FM; Mercer SW; Russell A; Bruce DA
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Aug; 21(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 22653078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.
    Scallan S; Locke R; Eksteen D; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 26915657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.