These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27006075)

  • 1. Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program.
    Mador RL; Kornas K; Simard A; Haroun V
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Mar; 14():22. PubMed ID: 27006075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice.
    Viergever RF; Olifson S; Ghaffar A; Terry RF
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2010 Dec; 8():36. PubMed ID: 21159163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An equity lens can ensure an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane Reviews.
    Nasser M; Ueffing E; Welch V; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):511-21. PubMed ID: 23477991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using evaluation theory in priority setting and resource allocation.
    Smith N; Mitton C; Cornelissen E; Gibson J; Peacock S
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(4-5):655-71. PubMed ID: 23115910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation.
    Madden S; Martin DK; Downey S; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2005 Jul; 73(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 15911053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review to identify research priority setting in Black and minority ethnic health and evaluate their processes.
    Iqbal H; West J; Haith-Cooper M; McEachan RRC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251685. PubMed ID: 34048459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives on the strategic uses of concept mapping to address public health challenges.
    Anderson LA; Slonim A
    Eval Program Plann; 2017 Feb; 60():194-201. PubMed ID: 27591959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study.
    Sibbald SL; Gibson JL; Singer PA; Upshur R; Martin DK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 May; 10():131. PubMed ID: 20482843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda.
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
    Health Policy; 2007 Jun; 82(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 17034898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quest for a framework for sustainable and institutionalised priority-setting for health research in a low-resource setting: the case of Zambia.
    Kapiriri L; Chanda-Kapata P
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Feb; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 29452602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing a framework for primary health care research in Canada: a scoping literature review.
    Montesanti S; Robinson-Vollman A; Green LA
    BMC Fam Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(1):144. PubMed ID: 30157764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological procedures for priority setting mental health research: a systematic review summarising the methods, designs and frameworks involved with priority setting.
    Deering K; Brimblecombe N; Matonhodze JC; Nolan F; Collins DA; Renwick L
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2023 Jun; 21(1):64. PubMed ID: 37365647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective stakeholder participation in setting research priorities using a Global Evidence Mapping approach.
    Clavisi O; Bragge P; Tavender E; Turner T; Gruen RL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):496-502.e2. PubMed ID: 22819249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation.
    Harris C; Green S; Elshaug AG
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Sep; 17(1):632. PubMed ID: 28886740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supporting collaborative use of the Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT) in health-related practice: a multiple case study research protocol.
    Rosella L; Peirson L; Bornbaum C; Kotnowski K; Lebenbaum M; Fransoo R; Martens P; Caetano P; Ens C; Gardner C; Mowat D;
    Implement Sci; 2014 Mar; 9(1):35. PubMed ID: 24655716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research priority setting in obesity: a systematic review.
    Iqbal H; McEachan RRC; West J; Haith-Cooper M
    Z Gesundh Wiss; 2021 Dec; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 34877248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration Instrument Review Project: a methodology to promote rigorous evaluation.
    Lewis CC; Stanick CF; Martinez RG; Weiner BJ; Kim M; Barwick M; Comtois KA
    Implement Sci; 2015 Jan; 10():2. PubMed ID: 25567126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating health research priority-setting in low-income countries: a case study of health research priority-setting in Zambia.
    Kapiriri L; Schuster-Wallace C; Chanda-Kapata P
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Nov; 16(1):105. PubMed ID: 30404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.