These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27006075)

  • 21. Developing interdisciplinary maternity services policy in Canada. Evaluation of a consensus workshop.
    Martin CM; Kasperski J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 16(1):238-45. PubMed ID: 20367842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.
    Teng F; Mitton C; Mackenzie J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():84. PubMed ID: 17565691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of logic models in a large scientific research program.
    O'Keefe CM; Head RJ
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Aug; 34(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 21555041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.
    Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health sector priority setting at meso-level in lower and middle income countries: lessons learned, available options and suggested steps.
    Hipgrave DB; Alderman KB; Anderson I; Soto EJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Feb; 102():190-200. PubMed ID: 24565157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What makes public health studies ethical? Dissolving the boundary between research and practice.
    Willison DJ; Ondrusek N; Dawson A; Emerson C; Ferris LE; Saginur R; Sampson H; Upshur R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Aug; 15():61. PubMed ID: 25104180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health research priority setting in Zambia: a stock taking of approaches conducted from 1998 to 2015.
    Chanda-Kapata P; Ngosa W; Hamainza B; Kapiriri L
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Sep; 14(1):72. PubMed ID: 27663308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Involving decision-makers in the research process: Challenges of implementing the accountability for reasonableness approach to priority setting at the district level in Tanzania.
    Maluka S; Kamuzora P; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK
    Glob Public Health; 2014; 9(7):760-72. PubMed ID: 24921238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Research, practice, and policy partnerships in pan-Canadian coalitions for cancer and chronic disease prevention.
    Manafò E; Petermann L; Lobb R; Keen D; Kerner J
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2011; 17(6):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 21964372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Developing research capacity building for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander health workers in health service settings.
    Bailey J; Veitch C; Crossland L; Preston R
    Rural Remote Health; 2006; 6(4):556. PubMed ID: 17187447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting.
    Oxman AD; Schünemann HJ; Fretheim A
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2006 Nov; 4():14. PubMed ID: 17134481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A framework for monitoring social process and outcomes in environmental programs.
    Chapman S
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Dec; 47():45-53. PubMed ID: 25128755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research priority setting in kidney disease: a systematic review.
    Tong A; Chando S; Crowe S; Manns B; Winkelmayer WC; Hemmelgarn B; Craig JC
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 May; 65(5):674-83. PubMed ID: 25582284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementing priority setting frameworks: Insights from leading researchers.
    Angell B; Pares J; Mooney G
    Health Policy; 2016 Dec; 120(12):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 27839887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting.
    Cotterill S; Knowles S; Martindale AM; Elvey R; Howard S; Coupe N; Wilson P; Spence M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 29347910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determining and broadening the definition of impact from implementing a rational priority setting approach in a healthcare organization.
    Cornelissen E; Mitton C; Davidson A; Reid C; Hole R; Visockas AM; Smith N
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Aug; 114():1-9. PubMed ID: 24887012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Priority setting for evaluation: developing a strategic evaluation portfolio.
    Spilsbury MJ; Norgbey S; Battaglino C
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Oct; 46():47-57. PubMed ID: 24921966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Indicators to guide health equity work in local public health agencies: a locally driven collaborative project in Ontario.
    Cohen B; Salter K; Kothari A; Janzen Le Ber M; Lemieux S; Moran K; Wai C; Antonello D; Robson J; Salvaterra R
    Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can; 2018; 38(7-8):277-285. PubMed ID: 30129715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A risk screening tool for ethical appraisal of evidence-generating initiatives.
    Ondrusek NK; Willison DJ; Haroun V; Bell JA; Bornbaum CC
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 16():47. PubMed ID: 26149410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.