These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2700674)

  • 1. [The implant denture in the laboratory].
    Scortecci GM; Crousillat J; Foesser P; Bourbon B
    Cah Prothese; 1989 Sep; (67):88-103. PubMed ID: 2700674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Implant-ceramometal prosthesis relation: esthetic and technical improvements].
    Perelmuter S
    Cah Prothese; 1990 Dec; (72):86-97. PubMed ID: 2268790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant abutment deformation during prosthetic cylinder screw tightening: an in vitro study.
    Neto RT; Moura MS; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 19639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
    Drago CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The suitability of head-of-implant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implant-retained three unit bridges: an in vitro study.
    Bartlett DW; Greenwood R; Howe L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 12526273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative analysis of different types of "implant-prosthesis" connection. Esthetic effect, prosthetic techniques].
    Leclercq P
    Cah Prothese; 1990 Dec; (72):28-44. PubMed ID: 2268787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of prosthetic abutments respecting peri-implant soft tissues.
    Ceruti P; Lorenzetti M; Barabino E; Menicucci G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2005 Oct; 54(10):601-8. PubMed ID: 16224380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments.
    Priest G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9 Suppl 2):22-32. PubMed ID: 16125013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.