These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27006872)

  • 1. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
    Chen CH
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process.
    C S; Subramaniam SK
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26374. PubMed ID: 38390129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extension of correlation coefficient based TOPSIS technique for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy soft set: A case study in extract, transform, and load techniques.
    Zulqarnain RM; Siddique I; Asif M; Ahmad H; Askar S; Gurmani SH
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287032. PubMed ID: 37903157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches.
    Heidarisoltanabadi M; Elhami B; Imanmehr A; Khadivi A
    Food Sci Nutr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 38370082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS.
    Zaidan AA; Zaidan BB; Al-Haiqi A; Kiah ML; Hussain M; Abdulnabi M
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():390-404. PubMed ID: 25483886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.
    Akcan S; Güldeş M
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():5614892. PubMed ID: 31687120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada.
    El Allaki F; Christensen J; Vallières A
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Apr; 165():36-43. PubMed ID: 30851926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
    Rashidi F; Sharifian S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.
    Pathan AI; Girish Agnihotri P; Said S; Patel D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jun; 194(7):509. PubMed ID: 35713716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multicriteria Decision-Making Framework for Access Point Selection in Hybrid LiFi/WiFi Networks Using Integrated AHP-VIKOR Technique.
    Badeel R; Subramaniam SK; Muhammed A; Hanapi ZM
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Near-Earth object hazardous impact: A Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach.
    Sánchez-Lozano JM; Fernández-Martínez M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37055. PubMed ID: 27848986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection.
    Abdel-Basset M; Manogaran G; Gamal A; Smarandache F
    J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):38. PubMed ID: 30627801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for selecting processes for automation with AHP and TOPSIS.
    Costa DS; Mamede HS; da Silva MM
    Heliyon; 2023 Mar; 9(3):e13683. PubMed ID: 36873512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Material selection in design for deconstruction using Kano model, fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology.
    Zoghi M; Rostami G; Khoshand A; Motalleb F
    Waste Manag Res; 2022 Apr; 40(4):410-419. PubMed ID: 33928814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
    Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
    Kiracı K; Akan E
    J Air Transp Manag; 2020 Oct; 89():101924. PubMed ID: 32989347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: a case study in Naqadeh, Iran.
    Khorsandi H; Faramarzi A; Aghapour AA; Jafari SJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Nov; 191(12):730. PubMed ID: 31705330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing biometric system selection: A hybrid AHP-neutrosophic fuzzy TOPSIS approach.
    Rachel J; Devarasan E; Razzaque A; Selvakumar S
    BMC Res Notes; 2024 Sep; 17(1):263. PubMed ID: 39272141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.