These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27006872)

  • 41. Optimal evaluation of crop residues for gasification in Ghana using integrated multi-criterial decision making techniques.
    Osei I; Addo A; Kemausuor F
    Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20553. PubMed ID: 37822638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An application of multi-criteria decision-making approach to sustainable drug shortages management: evidence from a developing country.
    Moosivand A; Rangchian M; Zarei L; Peiravian F; Mehralian G; Sharifnia H
    J Pharm Health Care Sci; 2021 Apr; 7(1):14. PubMed ID: 33795021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Compatibility and correlation of multi-attribute decision making: a case of industrial relocation.
    Martino Neto J; Salomon VAP; Ortiz-Barrios MA; Petrillo A
    Ann Oper Res; 2022 Feb; ():1-22. PubMed ID: 35250141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Selection of an alternate cementitious mortar using ceramic tile dust waste: a hybrid MCDM approach.
    Nandipati S; Gvr SR; Degloorkar NK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38951398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach.
    Varmazyar M; Dehghanbaghi M; Afkhami M
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Oct; 58():125-140. PubMed ID: 27371786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluating treatment modalities in chronic pain treatment by the multi-criteria decision making procedure.
    Sir E; Batur Sir GD
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Oct; 19(1):191. PubMed ID: 31615483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
    Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach.
    Zhang H; Peng Y; Tian G; Wang D; Xie P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177578. PubMed ID: 28498864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A New Decision Model Approach for Health Technology Assessment and A Case Study for Dialysis Alternatives in Turkey.
    Öztürk N; Tozan H; Vayvay Ö
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32455609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Optimal Selection of Sewage Treatment Technologies in Town Areas: A Coupled Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model.
    Liu B; Tang J; Li Z; Yan Y; Chen J
    Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 66(4):709-721. PubMed ID: 32725384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating modern intrusion detection methods in the face of Gen V multi-vector attacks with fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS.
    Alhakami W
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302559. PubMed ID: 38743732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Application of TOPSIS method for flood susceptibility mapping using Excel and GIS.
    Mitra R; Das J; Kamruzzaman M
    MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102263. PubMed ID: 37416489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Identification of dominant risk factor involved in spread of COVID-19 using hesitant fuzzy MCDM methodology.
    Ghorui N; Ghosh A; Mondal SP; Bajuri MY; Ahmadian A; Salahshour S; Ferrara M
    Results Phys; 2021 Feb; 21():103811. PubMed ID: 33520630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Securing healthcare information system through fuzzy based decision-making methodology.
    Alharbi A; Ahmad M; Alosaimi W; Alyami H; Sarkar AK; Agrawal A; Kumar R; Khan RA
    Health Informatics J; 2022; 28(4):14604582221135420. PubMed ID: 36374584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of supply sustainability of vaccine alternatives with multi-criteria decision-making methods.
    Yazıcı E; Üner Sİ; Demir A; Dinler S; Alakaş HM
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2022 Jul; 37(4):2421-2444. PubMed ID: 35501891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process.
    Françozo RV; Junior LSVU; Carrapateira ES; Pacheco BCS; Oliveira MT; Torsoni GB; Yari J
    MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102277. PubMed ID: 37519948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The relative importance of factors influencing the surgeons' choice between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery for women with breast cancer.
    Koksalmis GH; Cetinguc B; Durucu M; Camgoz Akdag H; Gulluoglu BM; Karanlik H; Sezer A; Calisir F
    Health Care Women Int; 2024; 45(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 34851241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Novel Extension of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method with Objective Criteria Weights for Group Decision Making with Interval Numbers.
    Kacprzak D
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Nov; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 34828158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods.
    Bid S; Siddique G
    Heliyon; 2019 Jun; 5(6):e01956. PubMed ID: 31294108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.