These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27006872)
61. Investigation of the pharmaceutical warehouse locations under COVID-19-A case study for Duzce, Turkey. Erdogan M; Ayyildiz E Eng Appl Artif Intell; 2022 Nov; 116():105389. PubMed ID: 36059577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Evaluation of management practices in rice-wheat cropping system using multicriteria decision-making methods in conservation agriculture. Biswas T; Majumder A; Dey S; Mandal A; Ray S; Kapoor P; Emam W; Kanthal S; Ishizaka A; Matuka A Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8600. PubMed ID: 38615024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Double injection/single detection asymmetric flow injection manifold for spectrophotometric determination of ascorbic acid and uric acid: Selection the optimal conditions by MCDM approach based on different criteria weighting methods. Boroumand S; Chamjangali MA; Bagherian G Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2017 Mar; 174():203-213. PubMed ID: 27915157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Multi Criteria Decision Making for the Multi-Satellite Image Acquisition Scheduling Problem. Vasegaard AE; Picard M; Hennart F; Nielsen P; Saha S Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 32106445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions. Chen TY Artif Intell Rev; 2023; 56(7):7347-7401. PubMed ID: 36536928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Using the deterministic approach model for project portfolio selection problem (PPSP) solutions. Mogbojuri AO; Olanrewaju OA Heliyon; 2023 Sep; 9(9):e19129. PubMed ID: 37662808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. An integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS- and Entropy-TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking approach for evaluating green energy sources and its experimental analysis on pyrolysis. Lakshmi BM; Mathew M; Kinol AMJ; Vedagiri B; Perumal SB; Madhu P; Dhanalakshmi CS Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(40):61370-61382. PubMed ID: 35445298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. AHP VIKOR framework for selecting wind turbine materials with a focus on corrosion and efficiency. Raju SK; Natesan S; Alharbi AH; Kannan S; Khafaga DS; Periyasamy M; Eid MM; El-Kenawy EM Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):24071. PubMed ID: 39402085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A Security Assessment Mechanism for Software-Defined Networking-Based Mobile Networks. Luo S; Dong M; Ota K; Wu J; Li J Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31843-58. PubMed ID: 26694409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Ranking negative emissions technologies under uncertainty. Ng WY; Low CX; Putra ZA; Aviso KB; Promentilla MAB; Tan RR Heliyon; 2020 Dec; 6(12):e05730. PubMed ID: 33364497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Geospatial modelling of COVID-19 vulnerability using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study of West Bengal, India. Malakar S Model Earth Syst Environ; 2022; 8(3):3103-3116. PubMed ID: 34604502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Assessment of consolidative multi-criteria decision making (C-MCDM) algorithms for optimal mapping of polymer materials in additive manufacturing: A case study of orthotic application. Mian SH; Abouel Nasr E; Moiduddin K; Saleh M; Abidi MH; Alkhalefah H Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30867. PubMed ID: 38770323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Convalescent-plasma-transfusion intelligent framework for rescuing COVID-19 patients across centralised/decentralised telemedicine hospitals based on AHP-group TOPSIS and matching component. Mohammed TJ; Albahri AS; Zaidan AA; Albahri OS; Al-Obaidi JR; Zaidan BB; Larbani M; Mohammed RT; Hadi SM Appl Intell (Dordr); 2021; 51(5):2956-2987. PubMed ID: 34764579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach. Mobinizadeh M; Raeissi P; Nasiripour AA; Olyaeemanesh A; Tabibi SJ Daru; 2016 Apr; 24():10. PubMed ID: 27068692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making. Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T Springerplus; 2016; 5():601. PubMed ID: 27247897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study. Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The application of a multi-parameter analysis in choosing the location of a new solid waste landfill in Serbia. Milosevic I; Naunovic Z Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1019-27. PubMed ID: 23853238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Similarity of TOPSIS results based on criterion variability: Case study on public economic. Vavrek R; Bečica J PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0271951. PubMed ID: 35925960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The data on the effective qualifications of teachers in medical sciences: An application of combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Khoshi A; Shams Gooshki H; Mahmoudi N Data Brief; 2018 Dec; 21():2689-2693. PubMed ID: 30761352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique. Ozkaya G; Erdin C Heliyon; 2020 Oct; 6(10):e05052. PubMed ID: 33117896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]