These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2700701)

  • 1. [Biocompatibility of crown and bridge materials. 1. Substances in contact with dentin].
    Klotzer WT
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Nov; 44(11):822-5. PubMed ID: 2700701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
    do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulpo-dentin protection: the biocompatibility of materials most commonly used in restorative work. A literature review.
    Marigo L; Vittorini Orgeas G; Piselli D; Saccomanno S; Rumi G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Sep; 48(9):373-95. PubMed ID: 10638171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biocompatibility of an enamel-dentin adhesive.
    Elbaum R; Remusat M; Brouillet JL
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Nov; 23(11):773-82. PubMed ID: 1305294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Biocompatibility of dentinal adhesive systems in conservative dentistry].
    Fratamico FC; Prati C
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Mar; 58(4):66-70. PubMed ID: 2203654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [General health damage by restorations of composite].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):444-7. PubMed ID: 11921987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulp response and cytotoxicity evaluation of 2 dentin bonding agents.
    Demarco FF; Tarquinio SB; Jaeger MM; de Araújo VC; Matson E
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 12066661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future directions in bonding resins to the dentine-pulp complex.
    Bouillaguet S; Wataha JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 15089947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reactionary dentinogenesis after applying restorative materials and bioactive dentin matrix molecules as liners in deep cavities prepared in nonhuman primate teeth.
    Duque C; Hebling J; Smith AJ; Giro EM; Oliveira MF; de Souza Costa CA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):452-61. PubMed ID: 16671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth.
    Mousavinasab M; Namazikhah MS; Sarabi N; Jajarm HH; Bidar M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 6: Reactions to restorative materials, tooth-restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques.
    Mjör IA; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):35-63. PubMed ID: 11887534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Penetration of the pulp chamber by bleaching agents in teeth restored with various restorative materials.
    Gökay O; Yilmaz F; Akin S; Tunçbìlek M; Ertan R
    J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 11194380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biocompatibility of dentine-bonding agents. 2. Pulpal considerations.
    Santini A
    Prim Dent Care; 1998 Apr; 5(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 9656939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Variations in the biocompatibility of a dentin adhesive during its clinical use].
    Brouillet JL; Franquin JC; Erard E
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1987 Jun; 41(158):291-318. PubMed ID: 3328478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites.
    Murray PE; Windsor LJ; Hafez AA; Stevenson RG; Cox CF
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 12760695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the link between a new dentinal desensitizer and dentine.
    Brenna F; Tagliabue A; Levrini L; Tettamanti L; Quacci D; Bergamaschi M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003 Sep; 52(9):413-21, 421-5. PubMed ID: 14608247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.