333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2700730)
1. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
Biffar R; Bittner B
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
Ishida K
Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.
Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Al-Athel MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy.
Davis RD; Schwartz RS
Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 1854447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Impressions].
Laverman JV
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1991 Oct; 98(10):403-7. PubMed ID: 1820536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Mendez AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
