These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27007605)

  • 1. Detection of error-related negativity in complex visual stimuli: a new neuroergonomic arrow in the practitioner's quiver.
    Sawyer BD; Karwowski W; Xanthopoulos P; Hancock PA
    Ergonomics; 2017 Feb; 60(2):234-240. PubMed ID: 27007605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The error-related negativity for error processing in interoception.
    Tan Y; Vandeput J; Qiu J; Van den Bergh O; von Leupoldt A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 184():386-395. PubMed ID: 30227231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types.
    Maier M; Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2263-73. PubMed ID: 18457501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Authors' reply to the commentary on "Establishing norms for error-related brain activity during the arrow Flanker task among young adults".
    MacNamara A; Imburgio MJ; Hill KE; Banica I; Weinberg A; Foti D
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 232():117908. PubMed ID: 33652145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error-monitoring across social and affective processing contexts.
    Suzuki T; Ait Oumeziane B; Novak K; Samuel DB; Foti D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Apr; 150():37-49. PubMed ID: 32004658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain negativity as an indicator of predictive error processing: the contribution of visual action effect monitoring.
    Joch M; Hegele M; Maurer H; Müller H; Maurer LK
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jul; 118(1):486-495. PubMed ID: 28446578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different laterality patterns of the error-related negativity in corrected and uncorrected errors.
    Hochman EY; Eviatar Z; Breznitz Z; Shaul S; Nevat M
    Laterality; 2009 Nov; 14(6):618-34. PubMed ID: 19408159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prefrontal neuromodulation using rTMS improves error monitoring and correction function in autism.
    Sokhadze EM; Baruth JM; Sears L; Sokhadze GE; El-Baz AS; Casanova MF
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2012 Jun; 37(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 22311204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed monitoring of accuracy errors compared to commission errors in ACC.
    Bediou B; Koban L; Rosset S; Pourtois G; Sander D
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):1925-36. PubMed ID: 22353628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurophysiological responses to gun-shooting errors.
    Xu X; Inzlicht M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 25448268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the ERN and the significance of errors.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Yeung N; Simons RF
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 15787852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-session attention bias modification and error-related brain activity.
    Nelson BD; Jackson F; Amir N; Hajcak G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):776-86. PubMed ID: 26063611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
    Stahl J; Gibbons H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A study of attentional resource of discrete and gradational allocation strategy using error-related negativity (ERN)].
    Tanaka H; Mochizuki Y; Masaki H; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2005 Apr; 76(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15962588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Error-related negativity in a visual go/no-go task: children vs. adults.
    Kim EY; Iwaki N; Imashioya H; Uno H; Fujita T
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 17488215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of error-monitoring event-related potentials in adolescents.
    Davies PL; Segalowitz SJ; Gavin WJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1021():324-8. PubMed ID: 15251904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diminished error-related brain activity as a promising endophenotype for substance-use disorders: evidence from high-risk offspring.
    Euser AS; Evans BE; Greaves-Lord K; Huizink AC; Franken IH
    Addict Biol; 2013 Nov; 18(6):970-84. PubMed ID: 23145495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing norms for error-related brain activity during the arrow Flanker task among young adults.
    Imburgio MJ; Banica I; Hill KE; Weinberg A; Foti D; MacNamara A
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jun; 213():116694. PubMed ID: 32142881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of late positivities associated with infrequent visual events and response errors.
    Helenius P; Laasonen M; Hokkanen L; Paetau R; Niemivirta M
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):619-28. PubMed ID: 20600965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric properties of the error-related negativity in children and adolescents.
    Meyer A; Bress JN; Proudfit GH
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jul; 51(7):602-10. PubMed ID: 24646380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.