These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27008933)

  • 1. Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errors.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):415. PubMed ID: 27008933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
    Poulton A
    Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
    Corbyn Z
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific record: Speed publication of self-corrections.
    Ronald P
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7603):321. PubMed ID: 27193669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?
    Nath SB; Marcus SC; Druss BG
    Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 16893357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
    Cooper-Mahkorn D
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
    Couzin J; Unger K
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retraction challenges.
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):5. PubMed ID: 25279879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
    Wager E; Williams P
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications.
    Kuroki T; Ukawa A
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 29519161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific record: Class uncorrected errors as misconduct.
    Kamoun S; Zipfel C
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):173. PubMed ID: 26961649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retractions: A clean slate.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):389-91. PubMed ID: 24654274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis.
    Huh S; Kim SY; Cho HM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163588. PubMed ID: 27706245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7694):18. PubMed ID: 29493609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role and responsibilities of coauthors.
    Lancet; 2008 Sep; 372(9641):778. PubMed ID: 18774402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
    Roehr B
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals.
    Hawkes N
    BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.