These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27008959)

  • 1. Peer review: Matchmaker aims to cut journal shopping.
    Kraus RH
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):448. PubMed ID: 27008959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
    Brookfield J
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
    Ploegh H
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In my opinion: reflections of a journal reviewer.
    Rosenbaum P
    Child Care Health Dev; 2002 Jul; 28(4):331-3. PubMed ID: 12190821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
    Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Checklists work to improve science.
    Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-year trial shows support for recognizing peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2019 Apr; 568(7752):275. PubMed ID: 30992584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists.
    Ball P
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):900. PubMed ID: 16107806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors?
    Sen CK
    Antioxid Redox Signal; 2012 Feb; 16(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 22098370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The registrar.
    Oyesiku NM
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Nov; 67(5):1165-6. PubMed ID: 20948397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On peer review.
    Schuklenk U
    Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editorial: Why Some Authors Make Bad Choices--Peer Review for Hire and Other Sad Stories.
    Beadling L; Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2441-3. PubMed ID: 25991436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students?
    Sanchis-Gomar F
    EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals.
    Sebire NJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 19035541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When R & R is not rest & recovery but revise & resubmit.
    Bearinger LH; Taliaferro L; Given B
    Res Nurs Health; 2010 Oct; 33(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 20827742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.