These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments. Ploegh H Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In my opinion: reflections of a journal reviewer. Rosenbaum P Child Care Health Dev; 2002 Jul; 28(4):331-3. PubMed ID: 12190821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud. Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Checklists work to improve science. Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On peer review. Schuklenk U Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial: Why Some Authors Make Bad Choices--Peer Review for Hire and Other Sad Stories. Beadling L; Leopold SS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2441-3. PubMed ID: 25991436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students? Sanchis-Gomar F EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals. Sebire NJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 19035541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When R & R is not rest & recovery but revise & resubmit. Bearinger LH; Taliaferro L; Given B Res Nurs Health; 2010 Oct; 33(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 20827742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback. Korngreen A Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]