These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27009246)

  • 1. LATIN AMERICAN IMAGE QUALITY SURVEY IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY STUDIES.
    Mora P; Khoury H; Bitelli R; Quintero AR; Garay F; Aguilar JG; Gamarra M; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 27009246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latin American dose survey results in mammography studies under IAEA programme: radiological protection of patients in medical exposures (TSA3).
    Mora P; Blanco S; Khoury H; Leyton F; Cárdenas J; Defaz MY; Garay F; Telón F; Aguilar JG; Roas N; Gamarra M; Blanco D; Quintero AR; Nader A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 24993012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement of early detection of breast cancer through collaborative multi-country efforts: Medical physics component.
    Mora P; Faulkner K; Mahmoud AM; Gershan V; Kausik A; Zdesar U; Brandan ME; Kurt S; Davidović J; Salama DH; Aribal E; Odio C; Chaturvedi AK; Sabih Z; Vujnović S; Paez D; Delis H
    Phys Med; 2018 Apr; 48():127-134. PubMed ID: 29599081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mean glandular dose in six digital mammography services in Santiago, Chile: preliminary reference levels.
    Leyton F; Nogueira Mdo S; Dantas M; Duran MP; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):115-20. PubMed ID: 25833896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nuptiality of unmarried women in Latin America.
    Camisa Z
    Notas Poblacion; 1978 Dec; 6(18):9-75. PubMed ID: 12309130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.
    Weigel S; Girnus R; Czwoydzinski J; Decker T; Spital S; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):892-5. PubMed ID: 17705112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):830-4. PubMed ID: 12033579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of full field digital (FFD) and computed radiography (CR) mammography systems in Greece.
    Kalathaki M; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Tritakis P; Kalyvas N; Simantirakis G; Manousaridis G; Kaisas I; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21821614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Results of an automatic evaluation of test images according to PAS 1054 and IEC 6220-1-2 on different types of digital mammographic units].
    Blendl C; Schreiber AC; Buhr H
    Rofo; 2009 Oct; 181(10):979-88. PubMed ID: 19676013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infant and child mortality in Latin America.
    Behm H; Primante DA
    Notas Poblacion; 1978 Apr; 6(16):23-44. PubMed ID: 12335524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Latin American Psychiatrist: profile and degree of satisfaction with the specialty].
    Córdoba RN; Cano JF; Alzate M; Olarte AF; Salazar I; Cendales R
    Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2009; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19267266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Latin American Dialysis and Renal Transplant Registry: 2008 report (data 2006).
    Cusumano AM; Gonzalez Bedat MC; García-García G; Maury Fernandez S; Lugon JR; Poblete Badal H; Elgueta Miranda S; Gómez R; Cerdas Calderón M; Almaguer López M; Moscoso Tobar J; Leiva Merino R; Sánchez Polo J; Lou Meda R; Franco Acosta B; Ayala Ferrari R; Escudero E; Saavedra López A; Mena Castro E; Milanés C; Carlini R; Duro Garcia V
    Clin Nephrol; 2010 Nov; 74 Suppl 1():S3-8. PubMed ID: 20979954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploratory survey of image quality on CR digital mammography imaging systems in Mexico.
    Gaona E; Rivera T; Arreola M; Franco J; Molina N; Alvarez B; Azorín CG; Casian G
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Jan; 83 Pt C():245-8. PubMed ID: 23938078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures.
    Dershaw DD; Fleischman RC; Liberman L; Deutch B; Abramson AF; Hann L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):559-62. PubMed ID: 8352104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.