These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27009246)

  • 21. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Demographic policy in Latin America].
    Courr Unesco; 1974; 27():62-3. PubMed ID: 12257588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Asthma mortality in Latin America.
    Neffen H; Baena-Cagnani CE; Malka S; Solé D; Sepúlveda R; Caraballo L; Caravajal E; Rodríguez Gavaldá R; González Díaz S; Guggiari Chase J; Díez C; Baluga J; Capriles Hulett A
    J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 1997; 7(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 9330190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.
    Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28956298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of Anemia in Latin America and the Caribbean.
    Mujica-Coopman MF; Brito A; López de Romaña D; Ríos-Castillo I; Coris H; Olivares M
    Food Nutr Bull; 2015 Jun; 36(2 Suppl):S119-28. PubMed ID: 26125197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attributes of patient-centered primary care associated with the public perception of good healthcare quality in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and El Salvador.
    Doubova SV; Guanais FC; Pérez-Cuevas R; Canning D; Macinko J; Reich MR
    Health Policy Plan; 2016 Sep; 31(7):834-43. PubMed ID: 26874326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
    Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New diagnostic reference level for full-field digital mammography units.
    Hauge IH; Bredholt K; Olerud HM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 23771960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
    Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression.
    Avrin D; Morin R; Piraino D; Rowberg A; Detorie N; Zuley M; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 17412135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
    Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
    Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Verdejo-Silva M; Guevara M; Lozano-Zalce H; Madero-Preciado L; Martín J; Noel-Etienne LM; Ramírez-Arias JL; Soto J; Villaseñor Y
    Arch Med Res; 2004; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N; Sechopoulos I; Mattsson S
    Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 25554018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimizing Digital Mammographic Image Quality for Full-Field Digital Detectors: Artifacts Encountered during the QC Process.
    Jayadevan R; Armada MJ; Shaheen R; Mulcahy C; Slanetz PJ
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(7):2080-9. PubMed ID: 26562238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assurance in screening mammography.
    Health Devices; 1990; 19(5-6):152-98. PubMed ID: 2372321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.