191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2700974)
1. Early marginal microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
Prati C
Dent Mater; 1989 Nov; 5(6):392-8. PubMed ID: 2700974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal morphology of Class V composite restorations.
Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Mongiorgi R
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 9522697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.
Yazici AR; Frentzen M; Dayangac B
J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11472808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal leakage of class II glass ionomer-composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
Hirschfeld Z; Frenkel A; Zyskind D; Fuks A
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Feb; 67(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 1538319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
Smith ED; Martin FE
Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage in class II composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling.
Darbyshire PA; Messer LB; Douglas WH
J Dent Res; 1988 Mar; 67(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 3049718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage in MOD resin composite with three dentin bonding agents.
Eakle WS; Nakamoto DK
Dent Mater; 1989 Nov; 5(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 2700971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
Bansal D; Mahajan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
