BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27010392)

  • 1. Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices.
    Kokubo Y; Oki H; Sugita D; Negoro K; Takeno K; Miyazaki T; Nakajima H
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 May; 26(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 27010392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
    Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hip joint arthroplasty following surgical treatment of acetabular fracture].
    Pavelka T; Linhart M; Houcek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 17026886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reconstruction of the acetabulum during replacement of the aseptically loosened polyethylene cup].
    Koudela K; Malotín T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11706538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
    Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of dual mobility cup cemented into a tantalum acetabular shell for hip revision with large bone loss can decrease dislocation risk without increasing the risk of mechanical failure.
    Hitz O; Le Baron M; Jacquet C; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Flecher X
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103739. PubMed ID: 37918693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Reconstruction of acetabular bone deficiency in total hip arthroplasty].
    Yang B; Lin J; Weng XS; Jin J; Zhao Q; Qiu GX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(12):920-3. PubMed ID: 19781247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
    Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T; Stastný E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
    Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
    de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mid-term results of cementless ultima cups in primary total hip replacement].
    Hrubina M; Behounek J; Skoták M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Jun; 75(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 18601819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
    Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Itoman M
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Allofit cementless acetabular component: five-year experience].
    Hoza P; Pilný J; Kubeš J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 23562260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up.
    Schreurs BW; Thien TM; de Waal Malefijt MC; Buma P; Veth RP; Slooff TJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 12672840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.