These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27010564)
1. Accuracy of a Dedicated Bone-Supported Surgical Template for Dental Implant Placement with Direct Visual Control. Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Kong L; Schepers S; Daems L; Legrand P; Jacobs R; Politis C; Vrielinck L J Healthc Eng; 2015; 6(4):779-89. PubMed ID: 27010564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template. Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Schepers S; Politis C; Van Slycke S; Vrielinck L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 24341829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Pettersson A; Komiyama A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 20491812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles. Ochi M; Kanazawa M; Sato D; Kasugai S; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24209910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers. Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Vasak C; Watzak G; Gahleitner A; Strbac G; Schemper M; Zechner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 21244498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study. Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study. Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Surgical Template on the Accuracy of Implant Placement. Xu LW; You J; Zhang JX; Liu YF; Peng W J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):641-646. PubMed ID: 26619380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]